According to the RISC-V Privileged Manual: "The Sv32 page-based
virtual-memory scheme described in sv32 supports 34-bit physical
addresses for RV32, so the PMP scheme must support addresses wider than
XLEN for RV32."
However, the current QEMU implementation uses `target_ulong` (which
resolves to `uint32_t` on RV32) for PMP address variables. When
shifting these addresses left (e.g., `this_addr << 2`), an integer
overflow occurs, truncating the high bits of the 34-bit physical
address.
Fix this issue by changing the types of PMP address variables
(`this_addr` and `prev_addr`) to `hwaddr`.
This issue was discovered and reported by SpecHunter, an AI-driven
architecture specification analysis tool.
Link: https://github.com/yizishun/rv-isa-sec/blob/master/output/riscv-isa-manual/pr-2472/qemu.txt
Signed-off-by: Zishun Yi <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <daniel.barboza@oss.qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <
20260511102627.
3120140-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
void pmp_update_rule_addr(CPURISCVState *env, uint32_t pmp_index)
{
uint8_t this_cfg = env->pmp_state.pmp[pmp_index].cfg_reg;
- target_ulong this_addr = env->pmp_state.pmp[pmp_index].addr_reg;
- target_ulong prev_addr = 0u;
+ hwaddr this_addr = env->pmp_state.pmp[pmp_index].addr_reg;
+ hwaddr prev_addr = 0u;
hwaddr sa = 0u;
hwaddr ea = 0u;
int g = pmp_get_granularity_g(env);