and not on the contents of those rows, the output list of the
subquery is normally unimportant. A common coding convention is
to write all <literal>EXISTS</literal> tests in the form
- <literal>EXISTS(SELECT 1 WHERE ...)</literal>. There are exceptions to
- this rule however, such as subqueries that use <token>INTERSECT</token>.
+ <literal>EXISTS(SELECT * FROM ... WHERE ...)</literal>, another common
+ convention is to write <literal>EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM ... WHERE
+ ...)</literal> or some other dummy constant. These conventions are
+ actually equivalent in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>, which
+ will optimize away evaluation of the subquery's output list altogether
+ when it cannot affect the number of rows returned. (An example
+ that cannot be optimized away is an output list containing a
+ set-returning function, since the function might return zero rows.)
</para>
<para>
* Note: by suppressing the targetlist we could cause an observable behavioral
* change, namely that any errors that might occur in evaluating the tlist
* won't occur, nor will other side-effects of volatile functions. This seems
- * unlikely to bother anyone in practice.
+ * unlikely to bother anyone in practice. Note that any column privileges are
+ * still checked even if the reference is removed here.
+ *
+ * The SQL standard specifies that a SELECT * immediately inside EXISTS
+ * expands to not all columns but an arbitrary literal. That is kind of the
+ * same idea, but our optimization goes further in that it throws away the
+ * entire targetlist, and not only if it was written as *.
*
* Returns true if was able to discard the targetlist, else false.
*/