unexpected action could be taken. This has been
corrected. [RT #39481]
-4121. [bug] When updating a response-policy zone via AXFR,
- summary data about other policy zones could fall
- out of sync. Ultimately this could trigger an
- assertion failure in rpz.c. [RT #39567]
+4121. [bug] On servers with one or more policy zones
+ configured as slaves, if a policy zone updated
+ during regular operation (rather than at
+ startup) using a full zone reload, such as via
+ AXFR, a bug could allow the RPZ summary data to
+ fall out of sync, potentially leading to an
+ assertion failure in rpz.c when further
+ incremental updates were made to the zone, such
+ as via IXFR. [RT #39567]
4120. [bug] A bug in RPZ could cause the server to crash if
policy zones were updated while recursion was
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- On servers with more than one policy zone configured,
- if one policy zone was updated via AXFR (especially when
- the zone was very large) a race condition could allow the
- RPZ summary data to fall out of sync with the policy zones,
- potentially leading to an assertion failure in rpz.c.
- [RT #39567]
+ On servers with one or more policy zones configured as
+ slaves, if a policy zone updated during regular operation
+ (rather than at startup) using a full zone reload, such as
+ via AXFR, a bug could allow the RPZ summary data to fall out
+ of sync, potentially leading to an assertion failure in
+ rpz.c when further incremental updates were made to the
+ zone, such as via IXFR. [RT #39567]
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>