Fix a goof in the block comment for invalidate_range_{start,end}() where
start() is incorrectly referred to as begin().
No functional change intended.
[seanjc@google.com: split to separate patch, write changelog]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260513163546.1176742-1-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Takahiro Itazuri <itazur@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* Invalidation of multiple concurrent ranges may be
* optionally permitted by the driver. Either way the
* establishment of sptes is forbidden in the range passed to
- * invalidate_range_begin/end for the whole duration of the
- * invalidate_range_begin/end critical section.
+ * invalidate_range_start/end for the whole duration of the
+ * invalidate_range_start/end critical section.
*
* invalidate_range_start() is called when all pages in the
* range are still mapped and have at least a refcount of one.