Lockdep detects a possible recursive locking scenario during
ucsi init:
[ 5.418616] ============================================
[ 5.418634] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 5.418706] --------------------------------------------
[ 5.418725] kworker/4:1/82 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 5.418759]
ffff888119a34648 (&con->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ucsi_init_work+0x1a78/0x2eb0 [typec_ucsi]
[ 5.418801]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 5.418835]
ffff888119a34080 (&con->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ucsi_init_work+0x1a78/0x2eb0 [typec_ucsi]
[ 5.418884]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 5.418904] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 5.418937] CPU0
[ 5.418956] ----
[ 5.418991] lock(&con->lock);
[ 5.419013] lock(&con->lock);
[ 5.419033]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 5.419387] Call Trace:
[ 5.419406] <TASK>
[ 5.419425] dump_stack_lvl+0x61/0xa0
[ 5.419448] print_deadlock_bug+0x4a6/0x650
[ 5.419483] __lock_acquire+0x62b6/0x7f50
[ 5.419507] lock_acquire+0x11b/0x390
[ 5.419654] __mutex_lock+0xbc/0xcd0
[ 5.419741] ucsi_init_work+0x1a78/0x2eb0
[ 5.419785] ? worker_thread+0xf53/0x2bc0
[ 5.419819] worker_thread+0xff4/0x2bc0
[ 5.419842] kthread+0x2a7/0x330
[ 5.419863] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[ 5.419896] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 5.419916] ret_from_fork+0x38/0x70
[ 5.419936] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 5.419969] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
[ 5.419991] </TASK>
[ 5.420009] ---[ end trace
0000000000000000 ]---
The problem is that all connector locks belong to the same
lockdep lock class, so the following loop:
for (i = 0; i < ucsi->cap.num_connectors; i++)
ucsi_register_port(connector[i])
mutex_lock(&connector[i]->lock)
looks like a recursive acquire of the same mutex. Put each connector
lock into a dedicated lock class so that lockdep doesn't see it as a
possible recursion.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260515060042.136083-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
INIT_WORK(&con->work, ucsi_handle_connector_change);
init_completion(&con->complete);
mutex_init(&con->lock);
+ lockdep_set_class(&con->lock, &con->lock_key);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&con->partner_tasks);
con->ucsi = ucsi;
goto err_reset;
}
+ for (i = 0; i < ucsi->cap.num_connectors; i++)
+ lockdep_register_key(&connector[i].lock_key);
+
/* Register all connectors */
for (i = 0; i < ucsi->cap.num_connectors; i++) {
connector[i].num = i + 1;
return 0;
err_unregister:
+ for (i = 0; i < ucsi->cap.num_connectors; i++)
+ lockdep_unregister_key(&connector[i].lock_key);
+
for (con = connector; con->port; con++) {
if (con->wq)
destroy_workqueue(con->wq);
usb_power_delivery_unregister(ucsi->connector[i].pd);
ucsi->connector[i].pd = NULL;
typec_unregister_port(ucsi->connector[i].port);
+ lockdep_unregister_key(&ucsi->connector[i].lock_key);
}
kfree(ucsi->connector);
struct ucsi *ucsi;
struct mutex lock; /* port lock */
+ struct lock_class_key lock_key;
struct work_struct work;
struct completion complete;
struct workqueue_struct *wq;