@item @command{cp}
@c ---------------
@prindex @command{cp}
-@cindex timestamp resolution
-Traditionally, file timestamps had 1-second resolution, and @samp{cp
--p} copied the timestamps exactly. However, many modern filesystems
-have timestamps with 1-nanosecond resolution. Unfortunately, @samp{cp
--p} implementations truncate timestamps when copying files, so this
-can result in the destination file appearing to be older than the
-source. The exact amount of truncation depends on the resolution of
-the system calls that @command{cp} uses; traditionally this was
-@code{utime}, which has 1-second resolution, but some newer
-@command{cp} implementations use @code{utimes}, which has
-1-microsecond resolution. These newer implementations include GNU
-coreutils 5.0.91 or later, and Solaris 8 (sparc) patch 109933-02 or
-later. Unfortunately as of September 2003 there is still no system
-call to set time stamps to the full nanosecond resolution.
+Some @command{cp} implementations (e.g., BSD/OS 4.2) do not allow
+trailing slashes at the end of nonexistent destination directories. To
+avoid this problem, omit the trailing slashes. For example, use
+@samp{cp -r source /tmp/newdir} rather than @samp{cp -r source
+/tmp/newdir/} if @file{/tmp/newdir} does not exist.
@c This is thanks to Ian.
SunOS @command{cp} does not support @option{-f}, although its
@c Ian said: ``I don't think -p or -r are portable''!!! How can you live
@c without -r???
+@cindex timestamp resolution
+Traditionally, file timestamps had 1-second resolution, and @samp{cp
+-p} copied the timestamps exactly. However, many modern filesystems
+have timestamps with 1-nanosecond resolution. Unfortunately, @samp{cp
+-p} implementations truncate timestamps when copying files, so this
+can result in the destination file appearing to be older than the
+source. The exact amount of truncation depends on the resolution of
+the system calls that @command{cp} uses; traditionally this was
+@code{utime}, which has 1-second resolution, but some newer
+@command{cp} implementations use @code{utimes}, which has
+1-microsecond resolution. These newer implementations include GNU
+coreutils 5.0.91 or later, and Solaris 8 (sparc) patch 109933-02 or
+later. Unfortunately as of September 2003 there is still no system
+call to set time stamps to the full nanosecond resolution.
+
Bob Proulx notes that @samp{cp -p} always @emph{tries} to copy
ownerships. But whether it actually does copy ownerships or not is a
system dependent policy decision implemented by the kernel. If the