This was a latent bug in the checks for removing of a forwarder block which has a phi.
Take:
<bb 15> [local count:
182536112]:
# arr1$0_32 = PHI <arr1$0_36(ab)(11)>
<bb 14> [local count:
206998870]:
# arr1$0_43(ab) = PHI <arr1$0_25(ab)(13), 9(15)>
# sj12_44(ab) = PHI <sj12_31(ab)(13), arr1$0_32(15)>
f8 ();
Here bb 15 predecessor is a normal edge.
So when merging the forwarder bb 15 into bb14 we end up with:
<bb 12> [local count:
206998870]:
# arr1$0_42(ab) = PHI <arr1$0_24(ab)(11), 9(9)>
# sj12_43(ab) = PHI <sj12_30(ab)(11), arr1$0_35(ab)(9)>
f8 ();
and now there is an overlap of live range of arr1$0_35 and arr1$0_42.
So we need to reject the case where we have phis and the phi arguments that
use abnormal uses.
Changes since v1:
* v2: Look at phi arguments of the forwarder block rather than the dest bb
having an abnormal edge out.
* v3: Fix bb_phis_references_abnormal_uses to use the gimple_phi_num_args to
search over the phi arguments. Also fix the commit message which was wrong.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
PR tree-optimization/125396
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-cfgcleanup.cc (bb_phis_references_abnormal_uses): New function.
(maybe_remove_forwarder_block): Check to make sure the
forwarder block does not have a phi that references ssa name that has
abnormal uses.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/torture/pr125396-1.c: New test.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@oss.qualcomm.com>
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* PR tree-optimization/125396 */
+
+
+char g7;
+int g13, g26;
+int g() __attribute__((returns_twice));
+void f8()
+{
+ int arr1[2];
+ int c2, c4;
+ char v6;
+ int sj12;
+ int sj14;
+lbl_br1:
+ if (g13) goto lbl_br3;
+ if (c4)
+ {
+ c4 = 0;
+ goto lbl_br6;
+ }
+ switch (v6)
+ case 1:
+ c4 = 1;
+ sj14 = g();
+ g13 = sj12;
+lbl_br3:
+ arr1[0] = 0;
+ sj12 = g();
+ c2 = g7;
+ g26 = 5;
+ if (c2) __builtin_unreachable();
+lbl_br6:
+ sj12 = arr1[0];
+ arr1[0] = 9;
+ if (g26) f8();
+ goto lbl_br1;
+}
}
}
+/* Returns true if a phi of the basic block BB has an
+ use of a ssa name that is used in an abnormal edge. */
+
+static bool
+bb_phis_references_abnormal_uses (basic_block bb)
+{
+ auto phis = phi_nodes (bb);
+ gimple_stmt_iterator i;
+ for (i = gsi_start (phis); !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next (&i))
+ {
+ gphi *phi = as_a<gphi*>(*i);
+ for (unsigned indx = 0; indx < gimple_phi_num_args (phi); indx++)
+ {
+ tree value = gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, indx);
+ if (TREE_CODE (value) == SSA_NAME
+ && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (value))
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
/* Return true if basic block BB does nothing except pass control
flow to another block and that we can safely insert a label at
the start of the successor block and was removed.
if (has_phi && gimple_seq_empty_p (phi_nodes (dest)))
return false;
+ /* When we have phi, make sure the phi does not have any uses of
+ names used in abnormal phis. */
+ if (has_phi && bb_phis_references_abnormal_uses (bb))
+ return false;
+
/* Now walk through the statements backward. We can ignore labels,
anything else means this is not a forwarder block. */
for (gsi = gsi_last_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_prev (&gsi))