From Lee:
| commit
c8d6c001d9ada542742dd7149c5e2b62ad3591c3
| Author: Lee Howard <faxguy@howardsilvan.com>
| Date: Sat Jun 23 16:59:13 2007 +0000
|
| With everything else that's going on (AT+FRS, AT+FTH) 4 seconds is just too
| short to expect us to get from the previous MCF to here in that time. Test
| cases show that 7 is more reliable.
and
| commit
f2d7c15c42d47c11fe94127aca8b69f0b256a337
| Author: Lee Howard <faxguy@howardsilvan.com>
| Date: Wed Sep 12 19:34:47 2007 +0000
|
| This needs to be just a bit longer.
return (false);
}
signalRcvd = 0;
- if (params.ec == EC_DISABLE && !getRecvEOLCount() && (Sys::now() - lastMCF < 4)) {
+ if (params.ec == EC_DISABLE && !getRecvEOLCount() && (Sys::now() - lastMCF < 9)) {
/*
* We last transmitted MCF a very, very short time ago, received no image data
* since then, and now we're seeing a PPM again. In non-ECM mode the chances of