From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:45:12 +0000 (+0200) Subject: power: sequencing: fix ABBA deadlock in pwrseq_device_unregister() X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2d5a7d406ecece5837af1e278ffbbf6c0315560a;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git power: sequencing: fix ABBA deadlock in pwrseq_device_unregister() The pwrseq core takes three locks in consistent order everywhere: pwrseq_sem -> pwrseq->rw_lock -> pwrseq->state_lock pwrseq_get() -> pwrseq_match_device() takes pwrseq_sem for reading, then rw_lock for reading. pwrseq_power_on()/pwrseq_power_off() take rw_lock for reading and then state_lock. pwrseq_device_unregister() is the only exception, it takes: state_lock, then rw_lock for writing and finally pwrseq_sem for writing. This created two potential ABBA deadlock situations that sashiko pointed out. - pwrseq_power_on/off() take rw_lock for reading then state_lock, while pwrseq_unregister() takes state_lock then rw_lock for writing - pwrseq_get() takes pwrseq_sem for reading then rw_lock for reading, while pwrseq_unregister() takes rw_lock for writing then pwrseq_sem for writing Reorder the unregister path to taking pwrseq_sem for writing -> rw_lock for writing and drop the state_lock entirely. This is safe as enable_count is only ever written under rw_lock held for read (via pwrseq_unit_enable()/disable(), reached only from pwrseq_power_on/off()), so holding rw_lock for writing already excludes every other writer and reader and the active-users WARN() stays race-free without state_lock. Fixes: 249ebf3f65f8 ("power: sequencing: implement the pwrseq core") Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616151049.1705503-1-vulab%40iscas.ac.cn Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260618-pwrseq-abba-deadlock-v1-1-943a3fd81c06@oss.qualcomm.com Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- diff --git a/drivers/power/sequencing/core.c b/drivers/power/sequencing/core.c index c1c2265160a3..02f42da91598 100644 --- a/drivers/power/sequencing/core.c +++ b/drivers/power/sequencing/core.c @@ -543,15 +543,18 @@ void pwrseq_device_unregister(struct pwrseq_device *pwrseq) struct device *dev = &pwrseq->dev; struct pwrseq_target *target; - scoped_guard(mutex, &pwrseq->state_lock) { + scoped_guard(rwsem_write, &pwrseq_sem) { guard(rwsem_write)(&pwrseq->rw_lock); + /* + * Holding rw_lock for write excludes all power on/off callers + * (they hold it for read), so it's safe to read enable_count + * here without taking the state_lock. + */ list_for_each_entry(target, &pwrseq->targets, list) WARN(target->unit->enable_count, "REMOVING POWER SEQUENCER WITH ACTIVE USERS\n"); - guard(rwsem_write)(&pwrseq_sem); - device_del(dev); }