From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 13:36:24 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: Use scalar_costs in vect_get_known_peeling_cost
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=39eac69cd3afabaeaf70fed19722bf049eac9819;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

Use scalar_costs in vect_get_known_peeling_cost

The following makes us use the scalar_costs summary when computing
the peeling cost part comparing different peelings for alignment.
That gets rid of repeated walks of LOOP_VINFO_SCALAR_ITERATION_COST
and the fallback to builtin_vectorization_cost.

	* tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_get_known_peeling_cost): Use
	scalar_costs instead of guesstimating it.
---

diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
index cc40f43c252..94f3d00d60e 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
@@ -3943,16 +3943,10 @@ vect_get_known_peeling_cost (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo, int peel_iters_prologue)
 	retval += builtin_vectorization_cost (cond_branch_taken, NULL_TREE, 0);
     }
 
-  stmt_info_for_cost *si;
-  int j;
-  if (peel_iters_prologue)
-    FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (LOOP_VINFO_SCALAR_ITERATION_COST (loop_vinfo), j, si)
-      retval += (builtin_vectorization_cost (si->kind, NULL_TREE, si->misalign)
-		 * peel_iters_prologue);
-  if (peel_iters_epilogue)
-    FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (LOOP_VINFO_SCALAR_ITERATION_COST (loop_vinfo), j, si)
-      retval += (builtin_vectorization_cost (si->kind, NULL_TREE, si->misalign)
-		 * peel_iters_epilogue);
+  retval += ((peel_iters_prologue + peel_iters_epilogue)
+	     * loop_vinfo->scalar_costs->body_cost ());
+  retval += (((peel_iters_prologue != 0) + (peel_iters_epilogue != 0))
+	     * loop_vinfo->scalar_costs->outside_cost ());
 
   return retval;
 }