From: Mark Andrews Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 01:06:18 +0000 (+0000) Subject: <> delimit urls X-Git-Tag: v9.3.6b1~131^2~24 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b4c8e92f7f1e5053941dd92e5e2ccb557443d5ff;p=thirdparty%2Fbind9.git <> delimit urls --- diff --git a/FAQ.xml b/FAQ.xml index 0020b7bc4c2..41a77303eda 100644 --- a/FAQ.xml +++ b/FAQ.xml @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ - PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. --> - +
Frequently Asked Questions about BIND 9 @@ -706,8 +706,7 @@ zone "list.dsbl.org" { requests are coming from a Windows 2000 machine, see - http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q246/8/04.asp - + <http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q246/8/04.asp> for information about how to turn them off. @@ -857,7 +856,7 @@ serial-query-rate 5; // default 20 usage rules and are leaking queries to the Internet. You should establish your own zones for these addresses to prevent you querying the Internet's name servers for these addresses. - Please see http://as112.net/ + Please see <http://as112.net/> for details of the problems you are causing and the counter measures that have had to be deployed. @@ -1010,7 +1009,7 @@ client: UDP client handler shutting down due to fatal receive error: unexpected See: - http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=113081708031466&w=2 + <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=113081708031466&w=2> @@ -1027,9 +1026,9 @@ client: UDP client handler shutting down due to fatal receive error: unexpected non-blocking is ignored. It is reported that setting xfrm_larval_drop to 1 helps but this may have negative side effects. See: -https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427629 +<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427629> and -http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/4/260 +<http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/4/260>. xfrm_larval_drop can be set to 1 by the following proceedure: @@ -1125,8 +1124,9 @@ modprobe capability Red Hat have adopted the National Security Agency's - SELinux security policy ( see http://www.nsa.gov/selinux - ) and recommendations for BIND security , which are more + SELinux security policy (see <http://www.nsa.gov/selinux>) + and recommendations for BIND security , which are more secure than running named in a chroot and make use of the bind-chroot environment unnecessary . @@ -1365,8 +1365,7 @@ rand_irqs="3 14 15" See also - http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/randomness.html - + <http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/randomness.html>. @@ -1388,7 +1387,7 @@ rand_irqs="3 14 15" - http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/anay/Weblog?catname=%2FSolaris + <http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/anay/Weblog?catname=%2FSolaris>