nft.8: Drop misleading adjective 'absolute'

Discussion showed that rule index may be interpreted as being absolute
or relative, so just drop this adjective without replacement.

Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>

diff --git a/doc/nft.xml b/doc/nft.xml
index ab94bff447326cb040fea4b908482ce13f165635..05193e67ed6dcc429c6ce232346fd5b20b75fc00 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/nft.xml
+++ b/doc/nft.xml
@@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ add table inet mytable
                <para>
                        The <literal>add</literal> and <literal>insert</literal> commands support an optional
                        location specifier, which is either a <replaceable>handle</replaceable> of an existing
-                       rule or an absolute <replaceable>index</replaceable> (starting at zero).  Internally,
+                       rule or an <replaceable>index</replaceable> (starting at zero).  Internally,
                        rule locations are always identified by <replaceable>handle</replaceable> and the
                        translation from <replaceable>index</replaceable> happens in userspace. This has two
                        potential implications in case a concurrent ruleset change happens after the translation