+2001-04-11 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
+
+ * ltmain.in: Mark duplicate libraries appearing in predeps and
+ postdeps as specialdeplibs. Explain the whole plan.
+
2001-04-11 Ossama Othman <ossama@uci.edu>
* config.guess: Updated to latest version.
if test $linkmode = lib; then
libs="$predeps $libs $compiler_lib_search_path $postdeps"
+
+ # Compute libraries that are listed more than once in $predeps
+ # $postdeps and mark them as special (i.e., whose duplicates are
+ # not to be eliminated).
+ pre_post_deps=
+ for pre_post_dep in $predeps $postdeps; do
+ case "$pre_post_deps " in
+ *" $pre_post_dep "*) specialdeplibs="$specialdeplibs $pre_post_deps" ;;
+ esac
+ pre_post_deps="$pre_post_deps $pre_post_dep"
+ done
+ pre_post_deps=
fi
deplibs=
case $deplib in
-L*) new_libs="$deplib $new_libs" ;;
*)
+ # And here is the reason: when a library appears more
+ # than once as an explicit dependence of a library, or
+ # is implicitly linked in more than once by the
+ # compiler, it is considered special, and multiple
+ # occurrences thereof are not removed. Compare this
+ # with having the same library being listed as a
+ # dependency of multiple other libraries: in this case,
+ # we know (pedantically, we assume) the library does not
+ # need to be listed more than once, so we keep only the
+ # last copy. This is not always right, but it is rare
+ # enough that we require users that really mean to play
+ # such unportable linking tricks to link the library
+ # using -Wl,-lname, so that libtool does not consider it
+ # for duplicate removal.
case " $specialdeplibs " in
*" $deplib "*) new_libs="$deplib $new_libs" ;;
*)