The unique names were introduced for the list-sas command in commit
04c0219e55d9338b6492548c073189bfd3d5431b. However, the child-updown
event wasn't updated to match. Even though the documentation suggests
that the section name of the CHILD_SAs are the same in both messages.
The original name is already being returned in the "name" attribute,
so it'll still be available.
Example:
>>> import vici, json
>>> s = vici.Session()
# First, for comparison, the list-sas command:
>>> print(json.dumps(list(s.list_sas()), sort_keys=True, indent=4, separators=(',', ': ')))
[
{
"vti0": {
"child-sas": {
"vti0-1": {
...
# A child-updown event before the change:
>>> for x in s.listen(["child-updown"]): print(json.dumps(x, sort_keys=True, indent=4, separators=(',', ': ')))
[
"child-updown",
{
"vti0": {
"child-sas": {
"vti0": { # <-- wrong: inconsistent with list-sas
...
# A child-updown event after the change:
>>> s = vici.Session()
>>> for x in s.listen(["child-updown"]): print(json.dumps(x, sort_keys=True, indent=4, separators=(',', ': ')))
[
"child-updown",
{
"vti0": {
"child-sas": {
"vti0-1": { # <-- fixed
Closes strongswan/strongswan#153.
{
vici_builder_t *b;
time_t now;
+ char buf[BUF_LEN];
if (!this->dispatcher->has_event_listeners(this->dispatcher, "child-updown"))
{
list_ike(this, b, ike_sa, now);
b->begin_section(b, "child-sas");
- b->begin_section(b, child_sa->get_name(child_sa));
+ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s-%u", child_sa->get_name(child_sa),
+ child_sa->get_unique_id(child_sa));
+
+ b->begin_section(b, buf);
list_child(this, b, child_sa, now);
b->end_section(b);