The '--start-after' doesn't explicitly mention being compatible with the
'--exclude' flag, generally only incompatibility is explicitly called
out. However, it would be nice to test the compatibility between the
two to avoid future regressions. Let's do that.
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
test_cmp expect actual
'
+test_expect_success 'start after, with exclude pattern' '
+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+ refs/tags/annotated-tag
+ refs/tags/doubly-annotated-tag
+ refs/tags/doubly-signed-tag
+ refs/tags/foo1.10
+ refs/tags/foo1.3
+ refs/tags/foo1.6
+ refs/tags/four
+ refs/tags/one
+ refs/tags/signed-tag
+ refs/tags/three
+ refs/tags/two
+ EOF
+ git for-each-ref --format="%(refname)" --start-after=refs/odd/spot \
+ --exclude=refs/tags/foo >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
test_expect_success 'start after, last reference' '
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
EOF