From: Tobias Brunner Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 12:47:05 +0000 (+0200) Subject: unit-tests: Add tests for IKE_SA rekeying if collision is not detected by one peer X-Git-Tag: 5.5.0dr1~4^2~19 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=566134b25a96863d08a1b4b8a0ec150c1eed0dcf;p=thirdparty%2Fstrongswan.git unit-tests: Add tests for IKE_SA rekeying if collision is not detected by one peer --- diff --git a/src/libcharon/tests/suites/test_ike_rekey.c b/src/libcharon/tests/suites/test_ike_rekey.c index 453493341b..2ec06aae90 100644 --- a/src/libcharon/tests/suites/test_ike_rekey.c +++ b/src/libcharon/tests/suites/test_ike_rekey.c @@ -257,6 +257,343 @@ START_TEST(test_collision) } END_TEST +/** + * In this scenario one of the peers does not notice that there is a rekey + * collision because the other request is dropped: + * + * rekey ----\ /---- rekey + * \ / + * detect collision <-----\---/ + * -------\--------> + * detect collision <-------\-------- delete old SA + * delete ---------\------> + * rekey done \-----> SA not found (or it never arrives) + */ +START_TEST(test_collision_dropped_request) +{ + ike_sa_t *a, *b, *sa; + message_t *msg; + status_t s; + + exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper, + &a, &b, NULL); + + /* Three nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial + * CHILD_SA): + * N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4 + * N3/5 <-----\--/ + * ... -----\ \-------> ... + * We test this three times, each time a different nonce is the lowest. + */ + struct { + /* Nonces used at each point */ + u_char nonces[3]; + /* SPIs of the deleted IKE_SAs (either redundant or replaced) */ + uint32_t del_a_i, del_a_r; + uint32_t del_b_i, del_b_r; + /* SPIs of the kept IKE_SA */ + uint32_t spi_i, spi_r; + } data[] = { + { { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 }, + { { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 }, + { { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 }, + { { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 }, + }; + /* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */ + assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown); + assert_hook_not_called(child_updown); + + exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0]; + initiate_rekey(a); + /* drop the CREATE_CHILD_SA request from a to b */ + msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender); + msg->destroy(msg); + exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1]; + initiate_rekey(b); + + /* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */ + exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2]; + assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey); + exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL); + assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING); + assert_child_sa_count(a, 1); + assert_ike_sa_count(0); + assert_hook(); + + /* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */ + assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4); + exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL); + assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING); + assert_child_sa_count(b, 0); + sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, TRUE); + assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED); + assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1); + assert_ike_sa_count(1); + assert_hook(); + + /* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */ + assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4); + assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE); + s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL); + ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s); + call_ikesa(a, destroy); + sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, FALSE); + assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED); + assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1); + assert_ike_sa_count(2); + assert_hook(); + + /* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */ + assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey); + assert_message_empty(IN); + s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL); + ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s); + call_ikesa(b, destroy); + assert_hook(); + + /* ike_updown/child_updown */ + assert_hook(); + assert_hook(); + + charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager); +} +END_TEST + +/** + * In this scenario one of the peers does not notice that there is a rekey + * collision because the other request is delayed: + * + * rekey ----\ /---- rekey + * \ / + * detect collision <-----\---/ + * -------\--------> + * \ /---- delete old SA + * \-/----> detect collision + * detect collision <---------/ /---- TEMP_FAIL + * delete -----------/----> + * rekey done / + * sa already gone <--------/ + */ +START_TEST(test_collision_delayed_request) +{ + ike_sa_t *a, *b, *sa; + message_t *msg; + status_t s; + + exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper, + &a, &b, NULL); + + /* Three nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial + * CHILD_SA): + * N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4 + * N3/5 <-----\--/ + * ... -----\ \-------> ... + * We test this three times, each time a different nonce is the lowest. + */ + struct { + /* Nonces used at each point */ + u_char nonces[3]; + /* SPIs of the deleted IKE_SAs (either redundant or replaced) */ + uint32_t del_a_i, del_a_r; + uint32_t del_b_i, del_b_r; + /* SPIs of the kept IKE_SA */ + uint32_t spi_i, spi_r; + } data[] = { + { { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 }, + { { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 }, + { { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 }, + { { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 }, + }; + /* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */ + assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown); + assert_hook_not_called(child_updown); + + exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0]; + initiate_rekey(a); + exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1]; + initiate_rekey(b); + + /* delay the CREATE_CHILD_SA request from a to b */ + msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender); + + /* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */ + exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2]; + assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey); + exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL); + assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING); + assert_child_sa_count(a, 1); + assert_ike_sa_count(0); + assert_hook(); + + /* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */ + assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4); + exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL); + assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING); + assert_child_sa_count(b, 0); + sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, TRUE); + assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED); + assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1); + assert_ike_sa_count(1); + assert_hook(); + + /* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> (delayed) */ + assert_single_notify(OUT, TEMPORARY_FAILURE); + exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, msg); + assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING); + + /* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */ + assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4); + assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE); + s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL); + ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s); + call_ikesa(a, destroy); + sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, FALSE); + assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED); + assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1); + assert_ike_sa_count(2); + assert_hook(); + + /* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(TEMP_FAIL) } */ + /* the SA is already gone */ + msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender); + msg->destroy(msg); + + /* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */ + assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey); + assert_message_empty(IN); + s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL); + ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s); + call_ikesa(b, destroy); + assert_hook(); + + /* ike_updown/child_updown */ + assert_hook(); + assert_hook(); + + charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager); +} +END_TEST + +/** + * In this scenario one of the peers does not notice that there is a rekey + * collision and the delete arrives after the TEMPORARY_FAILURE notify: + * + * rekey ----\ /---- rekey + * \ / + * detect collision <-----\---/ + * -------\--------> + * \ /---- delete old SA + * \-/----> detect collision + * no reschedule <---------/------ TEMP_FAIL + * detect collision <--------/ + * delete ----------------> + * rekey done + */ +START_TEST(test_collision_delayed_request_and_delete) +{ + ike_sa_t *a, *b, *sa; + message_t *msg; + status_t s; + + exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper, + &a, &b, NULL); + + /* Three nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial + * CHILD_SA): + * N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4 + * N3/5 <-----\--/ + * ... -----\ \-------> ... + * We test this three times, each time a different nonce is the lowest. + */ + struct { + /* Nonces used at each point */ + u_char nonces[3]; + /* SPIs of the deleted IKE_SAs (either redundant or replaced) */ + uint32_t del_a_i, del_a_r; + uint32_t del_b_i, del_b_r; + /* SPIs of the kept IKE_SA */ + uint32_t spi_i, spi_r; + } data[] = { + { { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 }, + { { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 }, + { { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 }, + { { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 }, + }; + /* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */ + assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown); + assert_hook_not_called(child_updown); + + exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0]; + initiate_rekey(a); + exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1]; + initiate_rekey(b); + + /* delay the CREATE_CHILD_SA request from a to b */ + msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender); + + /* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */ + exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2]; + assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey); + exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL); + assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING); + assert_child_sa_count(a, 1); + assert_ike_sa_count(0); + assert_hook(); + + /* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */ + assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4); + exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL); + assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING); + assert_child_sa_count(b, 0); + sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, TRUE); + assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED); + assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1); + assert_ike_sa_count(1); + assert_hook(); + + /* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> (delayed) */ + assert_single_notify(OUT, TEMPORARY_FAILURE); + exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, msg); + assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING); + + /* delay the INFORMATIONAL request from b to a */ + msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender); + + /* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(TEMP_FAIL) } */ + assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4); + assert_no_jobs_scheduled(); + exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL); + assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYED); + assert_child_sa_count(a, 0); + sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, FALSE); + assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED); + assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1); + assert_ike_sa_count(2); + assert_scheduler(); + assert_hook(); + + /* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } (delayed) */ + assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE); + s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, msg); + ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s); + call_ikesa(a, destroy); + + /* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */ + assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey); + assert_message_empty(IN); + s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL); + ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s); + call_ikesa(b, destroy); + assert_hook(); + + /* ike_updown/child_updown */ + assert_hook(); + assert_hook(); + + charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager); +} +END_TEST + /** * One of the hosts initiates a DELETE of the IKE_SA the other peer is * concurrently trying to rekey. @@ -438,6 +775,9 @@ Suite *ike_rekey_suite_create() tc = tcase_create("collisions rekey"); tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision, 0, 4); + tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_dropped_request, 0, 3); + tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_delayed_request, 0, 3); + tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_delayed_request_and_delete, 0, 3); suite_add_tcase(s, tc); tc = tcase_create("collisions delete");