Tom de Vries [Wed, 25 Sep 2024 22:36:21 +0000 (00:36 +0200)]
[gdb/python] Make sure python sys.exit makes gdb exit
With gdb 15.1, python sys.exit no longer makes gdb exit:
...
$ gdb -q -batch -ex "python sys.exit(2)" -ex "print 123"; echo $?
Python Exception <class 'SystemExit'>: 2
Error occurred in Python: 2
$1 = 123
0
...
This is a change in behaviour since commit a207f6b3a38 ("Rewrite "python"
command exception handling"), first available in gdb 15.1.
This patch reverts to the old behaviour by handling PyExc_SystemExit in
gdbpy_handle_exception, such what we have instead:
...
$ gdb -q -batch -ex "python sys.exit(2)" -ex "print 123"; echo $?
2
...
Tom de Vries [Sun, 15 Sep 2024 13:30:53 +0000 (15:30 +0200)]
[gdb/symtab] Revert "Change handling of DW_TAG_enumeration_type in DWARF scanner"
After adding dwarf assembly to test-case gdb.dwarf2/enum-type.exp that adds
this debug info:
...
<1><11f>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_enumeration_type)
<120> DW_AT_specification: <0x130>
<2><124>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_enumerator)
<125> DW_AT_name : val1
<12a> DW_AT_const_value : 1
<2><12b>: Abbrev Number: 0
<1><12c>: Abbrev Number: 5 (DW_TAG_namespace)
<12d> DW_AT_name : ns
<2><130>: Abbrev Number: 6 (DW_TAG_enumeration_type)
<131> DW_AT_name : e
<133> DW_AT_type : <0x118>
<137> DW_AT_declaration : 1
...
I run into an assertion failure:
...
(gdb) file enum-type^M
Reading symbols from enum-type...^M
cooked-index.h:214: internal-error: get_parent: \
Assertion `(flags & IS_PARENT_DEFERRED) == 0' failed.^M
...
This was reported in PR32160 comment 1.
This is a regression since commit 4e417d7bb1c ("Change handling of
DW_TAG_enumeration_type in DWARF scanner").
Fix this by reverting the commit.
[ Also drop the kfails for PR31900 and PR32158, which are regressions by that
same commit. ]
That allows us to look at the output of "maint print objfiles", and for val1
we get an entry without parent:
...
[27] ((cooked_index_entry *) 0x7fbbb4002ef0)
name: val1
canonical: val1
qualified: val1
DWARF tag: DW_TAG_enumerator
flags: 0x0 []
DIE offset: 0x124
parent: ((cooked_index_entry *) 0)
...
which is incorrect, as noted in that same comment, but an improvement over the
assertion failure, and I don't think that ever worked. This is to be
addressed in a follow-up patch.
Reverting the commit begs the question: what was it trying to fix in the first
place, and do we need a different fix? I've investigated this and filed
PR32160 to track this.
My guess is that the commit was based on a misunderstand of what we track
in cooked_indexer::m_die_range_map.
Each DIE has two types of parent DIEs:
- a DIE that is the parent as indicated by the tree structure in which DIEs
occur, and
- a DIE that represent the parent scope.
In most cases, these two are the same, but some times they're not.
The debug info above demonstrates such a case. The DIE at 0x11f:
- has a tree-parent: the DIE representing the CU, and
- has a scope-parent: DIE 0x12c representing namespace ns.
In cooked_indexer::m_die_range_map, we track scope-parents, and the commit
tried to add a tree-parent instead.
So, I don't think we need a different fix, and propose we backport the reversal
for gdb 15.2.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31900
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32158
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32160
(cherry picked from commit a2860473ef13cfebcd9fddc067b7b36ca56c6b81)
projects / thirdparty / binutils-gdb.git / log
