From 1d9cca850c5401784fe389b6792cb23c803d6342 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Krohm Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:36:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] s390x: disasm-test: Fix thinko Remove verbiage about limited support for opcodes with optional operands. Optional operands are of no concern for disassembly. The reason is that disassembly sees as its input only a sequence of bytes which have no indication as to whether some of its bits were explicitly specified or not. We're testing the disassembler here - not the assembler. --- none/tests/s390x/disasm-test/README | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/none/tests/s390x/disasm-test/README b/none/tests/s390x/disasm-test/README index 54df05cf9..a771c41c9 100644 --- a/none/tests/s390x/disasm-test/README +++ b/none/tests/s390x/disasm-test/README @@ -169,10 +169,6 @@ Status Only opcodes with extended mnemonics as identified in Appendix J of the Principles of Operation are considered. -There is only partial support for opcodes with optional operands. -In the sense that the generated testcases will always include the -optional operand. - TODO ---- -- 2.47.2