From c1fe4c92a7d6ffc9479d4776e0c49d796fa77f17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Boardman Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:27:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Misc commentary git-svn-id: svn://anonsvn.mit.edu/krb5/users/amb/referrals@18547 dc483132-0cff-0310-8789-dd5450dbe970 --- implementation.notes | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/implementation.notes b/implementation.notes index 7cdf9adea0..22a7912c3f 100644 --- a/implementation.notes +++ b/implementation.notes @@ -222,3 +222,9 @@ B if asked, and that the client fallback to the standard non-referral-based traversal is the only functional path here. But is that really the right thing? + +misc questions answered: +======================= +- should do_traversal code for old-style lookups still be requesting referrals? + If so, within what scope should they actually be used? + - probably not. the old traversal code is network-intensive and resilient enough as is. -- 2.47.2