| Issue | Title | Urgency | Due release |
|-------|-------|---------|-------------|
| [issue82](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/82) | Reach 100% RFC 9286 compliance | <span class="urgency-critical">Critical</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/12">2.0.0</a> |
| Issue | Title | Urgency | Due release |
|-------|-------|---------|-------------|
| [issue82](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/82) | Reach 100% RFC 9286 compliance | <span class="urgency-critical">Critical</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/12">2.0.0</a> |
| [issue149](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/149) | Lock the cache during updates | <span class="urgency-high">High</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/12">2.0.0</a> |
| [issue113](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/113) | Detect and properly respond to subtler RRDP session desynchronization | <span class="urgency-medium">Medium</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/12">2.0.0</a> |
| [issue124](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/124) | Atomize output files (`--output.roa` and `--output.bgpsec`) | <span class="urgency-medium">Medium</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/12">2.0.0</a> |
| [issue129](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/129) | Rethink the thread pools | <span class="urgency-medium">Medium</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/12">2.0.0</a> |
| [issue114](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/114) | Support automatic TA key rollover | <span class="urgency-very-high">Very High</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/13">2.0.1</a> |
| [issue58](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/58) | Fort's validation produces no router keys | <span class="urgency-very-high">Very High</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/14">2.0.2</a> |
| [issue149](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/149) | Lock the cache during updates | <span class="urgency-high">High</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/12">2.0.0</a> |
| [issue113](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/113) | Detect and properly respond to subtler RRDP session desynchronization | <span class="urgency-medium">Medium</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/12">2.0.0</a> |
| [issue124](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/124) | Atomize output files (`--output.roa` and `--output.bgpsec`) | <span class="urgency-medium">Medium</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/12">2.0.0</a> |
| [issue129](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/129) | Rethink the thread pools | <span class="urgency-medium">Medium</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/12">2.0.0</a> |
| [issue114](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/114) | Support automatic TA key rollover | <span class="urgency-very-high">Very High</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/13">2.0.1</a> |
| [issue58](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/58) | Fort's validation produces no router keys | <span class="urgency-very-high">Very High</span> | <a href="https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/milestone/14">2.0.2</a> |
| [issue116](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/116) | SLURM review | <span class="urgency-high">High</span> | - |
| [issue118](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/118) | Implement validation re-reconsidered | <span class="urgency-high">High</span> | - |
| [issue119](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/119) | Review IRIs to file names transition | <span class="urgency-high">High</span> | - |
| [issue116](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/116) | SLURM review | <span class="urgency-high">High</span> | - |
| [issue118](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/118) | Implement validation re-reconsidered | <span class="urgency-high">High</span> | - |
| [issue119](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/119) | Review IRIs to file names transition | <span class="urgency-high">High</span> | - |
| [issue70](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/70) | Do a quick temporary offline validation to prevent `No Data Available` | <span class="urgency-low">Low</span> | - |
| [issue123](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/123) | New invocation mode: Validate single file | <span class="urgency-low">Low</span> | - |
| [issue131](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/131) | Implement vCard validation | <span class="urgency-low">Low</span> | - |
| [issue70](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/70) | Do a quick temporary offline validation to prevent `No Data Available` | <span class="urgency-low">Low</span> | - |
| [issue123](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/123) | New invocation mode: Validate single file | <span class="urgency-low">Low</span> | - |
| [issue131](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/131) | Implement vCard validation | <span class="urgency-low">Low</span> | - |