Both CVEs are disputed by third parties. The observed behavior
(double free / invalid pointer free in readelf) only occurred in
pre-release code and did not affect any tagged version [1][2].
CVE_STATUS[CVE-2025-69650] = "disputed: observed behavior only in pre-release code, does not affect any tagged version"
CVE_STATUS[CVE-2025-69651] = "disputed: observed behavior only in pre-release code, does not affect any tagged version"
[1] https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69650
[2] https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69651
Signed-off-by: Adarsh Jagadish Kamini <adarsh.jagadish.kamini@est.tech>
(cherry picked from commit
9c6df56fe18237880c391798c2083dca595566f4)
Signed-off-by: Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@smile.fr>
CVE_STATUS[CVE-2023-25584] = "cpe-incorrect: Applies only for version 2.40 and earlier"
CVE_STATUS[CVE-2025-1180] = "patched: fixed by patch for CVE-2025-1176"
+CVE_STATUS[CVE-2025-69650] = "disputed: observed behavior only in pre-release code, does not affect any tagged version"
+CVE_STATUS[CVE-2025-69651] = "disputed: observed behavior only in pre-release code, does not affect any tagged version"
SRCREV ?= "f9488b0d92b591bdf3ff8cce485cb0e1b3727cc0"
BINUTILS_GIT_URI ?= "git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git;branch=${SRCBRANCH};protocol=https"