Reported by checkpatch:
FILE: drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
CHECK: Macro argument '...' may be better as '(...)'
to avoid precedence issues
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
#include "ssp.h"
#define SSP_DEV (&data->spi->dev)
-#define SSP_GET_MESSAGE_TYPE(data) (data & (3 << SSP_RW))
+#define SSP_GET_MESSAGE_TYPE(data) ((data) & (3 << SSP_RW))
/*
* SSP -> AP Instruction
}
#define SSP_GET_BUFFER_AT_INDEX(m, index) \
- (m->buffer[SSP_HEADER_SIZE_ALIGNED + index])
+ ((m)->buffer[SSP_HEADER_SIZE_ALIGNED + (index)])
#define SSP_SET_BUFFER_AT_INDEX(m, index, val) \
- (m->buffer[SSP_HEADER_SIZE_ALIGNED + index] = val)
+ ((m)->buffer[SSP_HEADER_SIZE_ALIGNED + (index)] = val)
static void ssp_clean_msg(struct ssp_msg *m)
{