ACPI: PAD: Rearrange acpi_pad_notify()

Use an if () in acpi_pad_notify() instead of a switch () statement to
make the code somewhat easier to follow and reduce its indentation
level.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3345485.5fSG56mABF@rafael.j.wysocki

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
index ec94b09bb747167a724a7a5718a71990773ffe58..91d32da76f8f12e7af65ff9f15d208716928972f 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
@@ -409,16 +409,13 @@ static void acpi_pad_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
 {
        struct acpi_device *adev = data;
 
-       switch (event) {
-       case ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY:
-               acpi_pad_handle_notify(handle);
-               acpi_bus_generate_netlink_event("acpi_pad",
-                                               dev_name(&adev->dev), event, 0);
-               break;
-       default:
+       if (event != ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY) {
                pr_warn("Unsupported event [0x%x]\n", event);
-               break;
+               return;
        }
+
+       acpi_pad_handle_notify(handle);
+       acpi_bus_generate_netlink_event("acpi_pad", dev_name(&adev->dev), event, 0);
 }
 
 static int acpi_pad_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)