]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git/blob - gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-test.exp
import gdb-2000-02-04 snapshot
[thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / testsuite / gdb.base / step-test.exp
1 # Copyright (C) 1997, 1998, 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
2
3 # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
4 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
5 # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
6 # (at your option) any later version.
7 #
8 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
9 # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
10 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
11 # GNU General Public License for more details.
12 #
13 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
14 # along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
15 # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
16
17 # Please email any bugs, comments, and/or additions to this file to:
18 # bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu
19
20 # use this to debug:
21 #
22 #log_user 1
23
24 # step-test.exp -- Expect script to test stepping in gdb
25
26 if $tracelevel then {
27 strace $tracelevel
28 }
29
30 set testfile step-test
31 set srcfile ${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}.c
32 set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
33
34 remote_exec build "rm -f ${binfile}"
35 if { [gdb_compile "${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug}] != "" } {
36 gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
37 }
38
39 gdb_exit
40 gdb_start
41 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
42 gdb_load ${binfile}
43
44 if ![runto_main] then {
45 fail "Can't run to main"
46 return 0
47 }
48
49 # Set a breakpoint at line 45, if stepi then finish fails, we would
50 # run to the end of the program, which would mess up the rest of the tests.
51
52 # Vanilla step/next
53 #
54 gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*x = 1;.*" "next 1"
55 gdb_test "step" ".*${decimal}.*y = 2;.*" "step 1"
56
57 # With count
58 #
59 gdb_test "next 2" ".*${decimal}.*w = w.*2;.*" "next 2"
60 gdb_test "step 3" ".*${decimal}.*z = z.*5;.*" "step 3"
61 gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*callee.*OVER.*" "next 3"
62
63 # Step over call
64 #
65 gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*callee.*INTO.*" "next over"
66
67 # Step into call
68 #
69 gdb_test "step" ".*${decimal}.*myglob.*" "step into"
70
71 # Step out of call
72 #
73 # I wonder if this is really portable. Are there any caller-saves
74 # platforms, on which `finish' will return you to some kind of pop
75 # instruction, which is attributed to the line containing the function
76 # call?
77
78 # On PA64 we end up at a different instruction than PA32
79 if { [istarget "hppa2.0w-hp-hpux*"] } {
80 send_gdb "finish\n"
81 gdb_expect {
82 -re ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.*= a.*3.*$gdb_prompt $" { pass "step out 1" }
83 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*INTO.*$gdb_prompt $" { pass "step out 2" }
84 timeout { fail "step out" }
85 }
86 } else {
87 gdb_test "finish" ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.*= a.*3.*" "step out"
88 }
89
90 ### Testing nexti and stepi.
91 ###
92 ### test_i NAME COMMAND HERE THERE
93 ###
94 ### Send COMMAND to gdb over and over, while the output matches the
95 ### regexp HERE, followed by the gdb prompt. Pass if the output
96 ### eventually matches the regexp THERE, followed by the gdb prompt;
97 ### fail if we have to iterate more than a hundred times, we time out
98 ### talking to gdb, or we get output which is neither HERE nor THERE. :)
99 ###
100 ### Use NAME as the name of the test.
101 ###
102 ### The exact regexps used are "$HERE.*$gdb_prompt $"
103 ### and "$THERE.*$gdb_prompt $"
104 ###
105 proc test_i {name command here there} {
106 global gdb_prompt
107
108 set i 0
109 while 1 {
110 send_gdb "${command}\n"
111 gdb_expect {
112 -re "$here.*$gdb_prompt $" {
113 # Okay, we're still on the same line. Just step again.
114 }
115 -re "$there.*$gdb_prompt $" {
116 # We've reached the next line. Rah.
117 pass "$name"
118 return
119 }
120 -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
121 # We got something else. Fail.
122 fail "$name"
123 return
124 }
125 timeout {
126 fail "$name (timeout)"
127 return
128 }
129 }
130
131 # Have we gone for too many steps without seeing any progress?
132 if {[incr i] >= 100} {
133 fail "$name (no progress after 100 steps)"
134 return
135 }
136 }
137 }
138
139 test_i "stepi to next line" "stepi" \
140 ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.* = a.*3" \
141 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI"
142 test_i "stepi into function" "stepi" \
143 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI" \
144 ".*callee \\(\\) at .*step-test\\.c"
145
146 # Continue to step until we reach the function's body. This makes it
147 # more likely that we've actually completed the prologue, so "finish"
148 # will work.
149 test_i "stepi into function's first source line" "stepi" \
150 ".*${decimal}.*int callee" \
151 ".*${decimal}.*myglob.*; return 0;"
152
153 # Have to be careful here, if the finish does not work,
154 # then we may run to the end of the program, which
155 # will cause erroneous failures in the rest of the tests
156 send_gdb "finish\n"
157 gdb_expect {
158 -re ".*(Program received|Program exited).*$gdb_prompt $" {
159 # Oops... We ran to the end of the program... Better reset
160 if {![runto_main]} then {
161 fail "Can't run to main"
162 return 0
163 }
164 if {![runto step-test.c:45]} {
165 fail "Can't run to line 45"
166 return 0
167 }
168 fail "stepi: finish call"
169 }
170 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*NEXTI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
171 pass "stepi: finish call"
172 }
173 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
174 # On PA64 we end up at a different instruction than PA32
175 if { [istarget "hppa2.0w-hp-hpux*"] } {
176 pass "stepi: finish call 2"
177 } else {
178 fail "stepi: finish call 2"
179 return
180 }
181 }
182 -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
183 # We got something else. Fail.
184 fail "stepi: finish call"
185 return
186 }
187 timeout {
188 fail "stepi: finish call (timeout)"
189 return
190 }
191 }
192
193 test_i "nexti over function" "nexti" \
194 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*NEXTI" \
195 ".*${decimal}.*y = w \\+ z;"
196
197 # On some platforms, if we try to step into a function call that
198 # passes a large structure by value, then we actually end up stepping
199 # into memcpy, bcopy, or some such --- GCC emits the call to pass the
200 # argument. Opinion is bitterly divided about whether this is the
201 # right behavior for GDB or not, but we'll catch it here, so folks
202 # won't forget about it.
203
204 gdb_test \
205 "break [gdb_get_line_number "step-test.exp: large struct by value"]" \
206 ".*Breakpoint.* at .*" \
207 "set breakpoint at call to large_struct_by_value"
208 gdb_test "continue" \
209 ".*Breakpoint ${decimal},.*large_struct_by_value.*" \
210 "run to pass large struct"
211 gdb_test "step" \
212 ".*step-test.exp: arrive here 1.*" \
213 "large struct by value"
214
215 gdb_continue_to_end "step-test.exp"
216
217 return 0