]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/gcc.git/blame - boehm-gc/doc/README
re PR target/78594 (Bug in November 11th, 2016 change to rs6000.md)
[thirdparty/gcc.git] / boehm-gc / doc / README
CommitLineData
f54d4287
BM
1Copyright (c) 1988, 1989 Hans-J. Boehm, Alan J. Demers
2Copyright (c) 1991-1996 by Xerox Corporation. All rights reserved.
3Copyright (c) 1996-1999 by Silicon Graphics. All rights reserved.
4109fe85 4Copyright (c) 1999-2004 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
f54d4287
BM
5
6The file linux_threads.c is also
7Copyright (c) 1998 by Fergus Henderson. All rights reserved.
8
6b1786aa 9The files Makefile.am, and configure.ac are
f54d4287
BM
10Copyright (c) 2001 by Red Hat Inc. All rights reserved.
11
30c3de1f
JS
12Several files supporting GNU-style builds are copyrighted by the Free
13Software Foundation, and carry a different license from that given
14below.
5a2586cf 15
f54d4287
BM
16THIS MATERIAL IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITH ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED
17OR IMPLIED. ANY USE IS AT YOUR OWN RISK.
18
19Permission is hereby granted to use or copy this program
20for any purpose, provided the above notices are retained on all copies.
21Permission to modify the code and to distribute modified code is granted,
22provided the above notices are retained, and a notice that the code was
23modified is included with the above copyright notice.
24
5a2586cf
TT
25A few of the files needed to use the GNU-style build procedure come with
26slightly different licenses, though they are all similar in spirit. A few
27are GPL'ed, but with an exception that should cover all uses in the
28collector. (If you are concerned about such things, I recommend you look
29at the notice in config.guess or ltmain.sh.)
30
54f28c21 31This is version 6.6 of a conservative garbage collector for C and C++.
f54d4287
BM
32
33You might find a more recent version of this at
34
35http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc
36
37OVERVIEW
38
39 This is intended to be a general purpose, garbage collecting storage
40allocator. The algorithms used are described in:
41
42Boehm, H., and M. Weiser, "Garbage Collection in an Uncooperative Environment",
43Software Practice & Experience, September 1988, pp. 807-820.
44
45Boehm, H., A. Demers, and S. Shenker, "Mostly Parallel Garbage Collection",
46Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN '91 Conference on Programming Language Design
47and Implementation, SIGPLAN Notices 26, 6 (June 1991), pp. 157-164.
48
49Boehm, H., "Space Efficient Conservative Garbage Collection", Proceedings
50of the ACM SIGPLAN '91 Conference on Programming Language Design and
51Implementation, SIGPLAN Notices 28, 6 (June 1993), pp. 197-206.
52
53Boehm H., "Reducing Garbage Collector Cache Misses", Proceedings of the
542000 International Symposium on Memory Management.
55
56 Possible interactions between the collector and optimizing compilers are
57discussed in
58
59Boehm, H., and D. Chase, "A Proposal for GC-safe C Compilation",
60The Journal of C Language Translation 4, 2 (December 1992).
61
62and
63
64Boehm H., "Simple GC-safe Compilation", Proceedings
65of the ACM SIGPLAN '96 Conference on Programming Language Design and
66Implementation.
67
68(Some of these are also available from
69http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/papers/, among other places.)
70
71 Unlike the collector described in the second reference, this collector
72operates either with the mutator stopped during the entire collection
73(default) or incrementally during allocations. (The latter is supported
74on only a few machines.) On the most common platforms, it can be built
75with or without thread support. On a few platforms, it can take advantage
76of a multiprocessor to speed up garbage collection.
77
78 Many of the ideas underlying the collector have previously been explored
79by others. Notably, some of the run-time systems developed at Xerox PARC
80in the early 1980s conservatively scanned thread stacks to locate possible
81pointers (cf. Paul Rovner, "On Adding Garbage Collection and Runtime Types
82to a Strongly-Typed Statically Checked, Concurrent Language" Xerox PARC
83CSL 84-7). Doug McIlroy wrote a simpler fully conservative collector that
84was part of version 8 UNIX (tm), but appears to not have received
85widespread use.
86
87 Rudimentary tools for use of the collector as a leak detector are included
88(see http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/leak.html),
89as is a fairly sophisticated string package "cord" that makes use of the
90collector. (See doc/README.cords and H.-J. Boehm, R. Atkinson, and M. Plass,
91"Ropes: An Alternative to Strings", Software Practice and Experience 25, 12
92(December 1995), pp. 1315-1330. This is very similar to the "rope" package
93in Xerox Cedar, or the "rope" package in the SGI STL or the g++ distribution.)
94
95Further collector documantation can be found at
96
97http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc
98
99
100GENERAL DESCRIPTION
101
102 This is a garbage collecting storage allocator that is intended to be
103used as a plug-in replacement for C's malloc.
104
105 Since the collector does not require pointers to be tagged, it does not
106attempt to ensure that all inaccessible storage is reclaimed. However,
107in our experience, it is typically more successful at reclaiming unused
108memory than most C programs using explicit deallocation. Unlike manually
109introduced leaks, the amount of unreclaimed memory typically stays
110bounded.
111
112 In the following, an "object" is defined to be a region of memory allocated
113by the routines described below.
114
115 Any objects not intended to be collected must be pointed to either
116from other such accessible objects, or from the registers,
117stack, data, or statically allocated bss segments. Pointers from
118the stack or registers may point to anywhere inside an object.
119The same is true for heap pointers if the collector is compiled with
120 ALL_INTERIOR_POINTERS defined, as is now the default.
121
122Compiling without ALL_INTERIOR_POINTERS may reduce accidental retention
123of garbage objects, by requiring pointers from the heap to to the beginning
124of an object. But this no longer appears to be a significant
125issue for most programs.
126
127There are a number of routines which modify the pointer recognition
128algorithm. GC_register_displacement allows certain interior pointers
129to be recognized even if ALL_INTERIOR_POINTERS is nor defined.
130GC_malloc_ignore_off_page allows some pointers into the middle of large objects
131to be disregarded, greatly reducing the probablility of accidental
132retention of large objects. For most purposes it seems best to compile
133with ALL_INTERIOR_POINTERS and to use GC_malloc_ignore_off_page if
134you get collector warnings from allocations of very large objects.
135See README.debugging for details.
136
137 WARNING: pointers inside memory allocated by the standard "malloc" are not
138seen by the garbage collector. Thus objects pointed to only from such a
139region may be prematurely deallocated. It is thus suggested that the
140standard "malloc" be used only for memory regions, such as I/O buffers, that
141are guaranteed not to contain pointers to garbage collectable memory.
142Pointers in C language automatic, static, or register variables,
143are correctly recognized. (Note that GC_malloc_uncollectable has semantics
144similar to standard malloc, but allocates objects that are traced by the
145collector.)
146
147 WARNING: the collector does not always know how to find pointers in data
148areas that are associated with dynamic libraries. This is easy to
149remedy IF you know how to find those data areas on your operating
150system (see GC_add_roots). Code for doing this under SunOS, IRIX 5.X and 6.X,
151HP/UX, Alpha OSF/1, Linux, and win32 is included and used by default. (See
152README.win32 for win32 details.) On other systems pointers from dynamic
153library data areas may not be considered by the collector.
154If you're writing a program that depends on the collector scanning
155dynamic library data areas, it may be a good idea to include at least
156one call to GC_is_visible() to ensure that those areas are visible
157to the collector.
158
159 Note that the garbage collector does not need to be informed of shared
160read-only data. However if the shared library mechanism can introduce
161discontiguous data areas that may contain pointers, then the collector does
162need to be informed.
163
164 Signal processing for most signals may be deferred during collection,
165and during uninterruptible parts of the allocation process.
166Like standard ANSI C mallocs, by default it is unsafe to invoke
167malloc (and other GC routines) from a signal handler while another
168malloc call may be in progress. Removing -DNO_SIGNALS from Makefile
169attempts to remedy that. But that may not be reliable with a compiler that
170substantially reorders memory operations inside GC_malloc.
171
172 The allocator/collector can also be configured for thread-safe operation.
173(Full signal safety can also be achieved, but only at the cost of two system
174calls per malloc, which is usually unacceptable.)
175WARNING: the collector does not guarantee to scan thread-local storage
176(e.g. of the kind accessed with pthread_getspecific()). The collector
177does scan thread stacks, though, so generally the best solution is to
178ensure that any pointers stored in thread-local storage are also
179stored on the thread's stack for the duration of their lifetime.
180(This is arguably a longstanding bug, but it hasn't been fixed yet.)
181
182INSTALLATION AND PORTABILITY
183
184 As distributed, the macro SILENT is defined in Makefile.
185In the event of problems, this can be removed to obtain a moderate
186amount of descriptive output for each collection.
187(The given statistics exhibit a few peculiarities.
188Things don't appear to add up for a variety of reasons, most notably
189fragmentation losses. These are probably much more significant for the
190contrived program "test.c" than for your application.)
191
192 Note that typing "make test" will automatically build the collector
193and then run setjmp_test and gctest. Setjmp_test will give you information
194about configuring the collector, which is useful primarily if you have
195a machine that's not already supported. Gctest is a somewhat superficial
196test of collector functionality. Failure is indicated by a core dump or
197a message to the effect that the collector is broken. Gctest takes about
19835 seconds to run on a SPARCstation 2. It may use up to 8 MB of memory. (The
199multi-threaded version will use more. 64-bit versions may use more.)
200"Make test" will also, as its last step, attempt to build and test the
201"cord" string library. This will fail without an ANSI C compiler, but
202the garbage collector itself should still be usable.
203
204 The Makefile will generate a library gc.a which you should link against.
205Typing "make cords" will add the cord library to gc.a.
206Note that this requires an ANSI C compiler.
207
208 It is suggested that if you need to replace a piece of the collector
209(e.g. GC_mark_rts.c) you simply list your version ahead of gc.a on the
210ld command line, rather than replacing the one in gc.a. (This will
211generate numerous warnings under some versions of AIX, but it still
212works.)
213
214 All include files that need to be used by clients will be put in the
215include subdirectory. (Normally this is just gc.h. "Make cords" adds
216"cord.h" and "ec.h".)
217
218 The collector currently is designed to run essentially unmodified on
219machines that use a flat 32-bit or 64-bit address space.
220That includes the vast majority of Workstations and X86 (X >= 3) PCs.
221(The list here was deleted because it was getting too long and constantly
222out of date.)
223 It does NOT run under plain 16-bit DOS or Windows 3.X. There are however
224various packages (e.g. win32s, djgpp) that allow flat 32-bit address
225applications to run under those systemsif the have at least an 80386 processor,
226and several of those are compatible with the collector.
227
228 In a few cases (Amiga, OS/2, Win32, MacOS) a separate makefile
229or equivalent is supplied. Many of these have separate README.system
230files.
231
30c3de1f 232 Dynamic libraries are completely supported only under SunOS/Solaris,
f54d4287 233(and even that support is not functional on the last Sun 3 release),
30c3de1f
JS
234Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, IRIX 5&6, HP/UX, Win32 (not Win32S) and OSF/1
235on DEC AXP machines plus perhaps a few others listed near the top
236of dyn_load.c. On other machines we recommend that you do one of
237the following:
f54d4287
BM
238
239 1) Add dynamic library support (and send us the code).
240 2) Use static versions of the libraries.
241 3) Arrange for dynamic libraries to use the standard malloc.
242 This is still dangerous if the library stores a pointer to a
243 garbage collected object. But nearly all standard interfaces
244 prohibit this, because they deal correctly with pointers
245 to stack allocated objects. (Strtok is an exception. Don't
246 use it.)
247
248 In all cases we assume that pointer alignment is consistent with that
249enforced by the standard C compilers. If you use a nonstandard compiler
250you may have to adjust the alignment parameters defined in gc_priv.h.
30c3de1f
JS
251Note that this may also be an issue with packed records/structs, if those
252enforce less alignment for pointers.
f54d4287
BM
253
254 A port to a machine that is not byte addressed, or does not use 32 bit
255or 64 bit addresses will require a major effort. A port to plain MSDOS
256or win16 is hard.
257
258 For machines not already mentioned, or for nonstandard compilers, the
259following are likely to require change:
260
2611. The parameters in gcconfig.h.
262 The parameters that will usually require adjustment are
263 STACKBOTTOM, ALIGNMENT and DATASTART. Setjmp_test
264 prints its guesses of the first two.
265 DATASTART should be an expression for computing the
266 address of the beginning of the data segment. This can often be
267 &etext. But some memory management units require that there be
268 some unmapped space between the text and the data segment. Thus
269 it may be more complicated. On UNIX systems, this is rarely
270 documented. But the adb "$m" command may be helpful. (Note
271 that DATASTART will usually be a function of &etext. Thus a
272 single experiment is usually insufficient.)
273 STACKBOTTOM is used to initialize GC_stackbottom, which
274 should be a sufficient approximation to the coldest stack address.
275 On some machines, it is difficult to obtain such a value that is
276 valid across a variety of MMUs, OS releases, etc. A number of
277 alternatives exist for using the collector in spite of this. See the
278 discussion in gcconfig.h immediately preceding the various
279 definitions of STACKBOTTOM.
280
2812. mach_dep.c.
282 The most important routine here is one to mark from registers.
283 The distributed file includes a generic hack (based on setjmp) that
284 happens to work on many machines, and may work on yours. Try
285 compiling and running setjmp_t.c to see whether it has a chance of
286 working. (This is not correct C, so don't blame your compiler if it
287 doesn't work. Based on limited experience, register window machines
288 are likely to cause trouble. If your version of setjmp claims that
289 all accessible variables, including registers, have the value they
290 had at the time of the longjmp, it also will not work. Vanilla 4.2 BSD
291 on Vaxen makes such a claim. SunOS does not.)
292 If your compiler does not allow in-line assembly code, or if you prefer
293 not to use such a facility, mach_dep.c may be replaced by a .s file
294 (as we did for the MIPS machine and the PC/RT).
295 At this point enough architectures are supported by mach_dep.c
296 that you will rarely need to do more than adjust for assembler
297 syntax.
298
2993. os_dep.c (and gc_priv.h).
300 Several kinds of operating system dependent routines reside here.
301 Many are optional. Several are invoked only through corresponding
302 macros in gc_priv.h, which may also be redefined as appropriate.
303 The routine GC_register_data_segments is crucial. It registers static
304 data areas that must be traversed by the collector. (User calls to
305 GC_add_roots may sometimes be used for similar effect.)
306 Routines to obtain memory from the OS also reside here.
307 Alternatively this can be done entirely by the macro GET_MEM
308 defined in gc_priv.h. Routines to disable and reenable signals
309 also reside here if they are need by the macros DISABLE_SIGNALS
310 and ENABLE_SIGNALS defined in gc_priv.h.
311 In a multithreaded environment, the macros LOCK and UNLOCK
312 in gc_priv.h will need to be suitably redefined.
313 The incremental collector requires page dirty information, which
314 is acquired through routines defined in os_dep.c. Unless directed
315 otherwise by gcconfig.h, these are implemented as stubs that simply
316 treat all pages as dirty. (This of course makes the incremental
317 collector much less useful.)
318
3194. dyn_load.c
320 This provides a routine that allows the collector to scan data
321 segments associated with dynamic libraries. Often it is not
322 necessary to provide this routine unless user-written dynamic
323 libraries are used.
324
325 For a different version of UN*X or different machines using the
326Motorola 68000, Vax, SPARC, 80386, NS 32000, PC/RT, or MIPS architecture,
327it should frequently suffice to change definitions in gcconfig.h.
328
329
330THE C INTERFACE TO THE ALLOCATOR
331
332 The following routines are intended to be directly called by the user.
333Note that usually only GC_malloc is necessary. GC_clear_roots and GC_add_roots
334calls may be required if the collector has to trace from nonstandard places
335(e.g. from dynamic library data areas on a machine on which the
336collector doesn't already understand them.) On some machines, it may
337be desirable to set GC_stacktop to a good approximation of the stack base.
338(This enhances code portability on HP PA machines, since there is no
339good way for the collector to compute this value.) Client code may include
340"gc.h", which defines all of the following, plus many others.
341
3421) GC_malloc(nbytes)
343 - allocate an object of size nbytes. Unlike malloc, the object is
344 cleared before being returned to the user. Gc_malloc will
345 invoke the garbage collector when it determines this to be appropriate.
346 GC_malloc may return 0 if it is unable to acquire sufficient
347 space from the operating system. This is the most probable
348 consequence of running out of space. Other possible consequences
349 are that a function call will fail due to lack of stack space,
350 or that the collector will fail in other ways because it cannot
351 maintain its internal data structures, or that a crucial system
352 process will fail and take down the machine. Most of these
353 possibilities are independent of the malloc implementation.
354
3552) GC_malloc_atomic(nbytes)
356 - allocate an object of size nbytes that is guaranteed not to contain any
357 pointers. The returned object is not guaranteed to be cleared.
358 (Can always be replaced by GC_malloc, but results in faster collection
359 times. The collector will probably run faster if large character
360 arrays, etc. are allocated with GC_malloc_atomic than if they are
361 statically allocated.)
362
3633) GC_realloc(object, new_size)
364 - change the size of object to be new_size. Returns a pointer to the
365 new object, which may, or may not, be the same as the pointer to
366 the old object. The new object is taken to be atomic iff the old one
367 was. If the new object is composite and larger than the original object,
368 then the newly added bytes are cleared (we hope). This is very likely
369 to allocate a new object, unless MERGE_SIZES is defined in gc_priv.h.
370 Even then, it is likely to recycle the old object only if the object
371 is grown in small additive increments (which, we claim, is generally bad
372 coding practice.)
373
3744) GC_free(object)
375 - explicitly deallocate an object returned by GC_malloc or
376 GC_malloc_atomic. Not necessary, but can be used to minimize
377 collections if performance is critical. Probably a performance
378 loss for very small objects (<= 8 bytes).
379
3805) GC_expand_hp(bytes)
381 - Explicitly increase the heap size. (This is normally done automatically
382 if a garbage collection failed to GC_reclaim enough memory. Explicit
383 calls to GC_expand_hp may prevent unnecessarily frequent collections at
384 program startup.)
385
3866) GC_malloc_ignore_off_page(bytes)
387 - identical to GC_malloc, but the client promises to keep a pointer to
388 the somewhere within the first 256 bytes of the object while it is
389 live. (This pointer should nortmally be declared volatile to prevent
390 interference from compiler optimizations.) This is the recommended
391 way to allocate anything that is likely to be larger than 100Kbytes
392 or so. (GC_malloc may result in failure to reclaim such objects.)
393
3947) GC_set_warn_proc(proc)
395 - Can be used to redirect warnings from the collector. Such warnings
396 should be rare, and should not be ignored during code development.
397
3988) GC_enable_incremental()
399 - Enables generational and incremental collection. Useful for large
400 heaps on machines that provide access to page dirty information.
401 Some dirty bit implementations may interfere with debugging
402 (by catching address faults) and place restrictions on heap arguments
403 to system calls (since write faults inside a system call may not be
404 handled well).
405
4069) Several routines to allow for registration of finalization code.
407 User supplied finalization code may be invoked when an object becomes
408 unreachable. To call (*f)(obj, x) when obj becomes inaccessible, use
409 GC_register_finalizer(obj, f, x, 0, 0);
410 For more sophisticated uses, and for finalization ordering issues,
411 see gc.h.
412
413 The global variable GC_free_space_divisor may be adjusted up from its
414default value of 4 to use less space and more collection time, or down for
415the opposite effect. Setting it to 1 or 0 will effectively disable collections
416and cause all allocations to simply grow the heap.
417
418 The variable GC_non_gc_bytes, which is normally 0, may be changed to reflect
419the amount of memory allocated by the above routines that should not be
420considered as a candidate for collection. Careless use may, of course, result
421in excessive memory consumption.
422
423 Some additional tuning is possible through the parameters defined
424near the top of gc_priv.h.
425
426 If only GC_malloc is intended to be used, it might be appropriate to define:
427
428#define malloc(n) GC_malloc(n)
429#define calloc(m,n) GC_malloc((m)*(n))
430
431 For small pieces of VERY allocation intensive code, gc_inl.h
432includes some allocation macros that may be used in place of GC_malloc
433and friends.
434
435 All externally visible names in the garbage collector start with "GC_".
436To avoid name conflicts, client code should avoid this prefix, except when
437accessing garbage collector routines or variables.
438
439 There are provisions for allocation with explicit type information.
440This is rarely necessary. Details can be found in gc_typed.h.
441
442THE C++ INTERFACE TO THE ALLOCATOR:
443
444 The Ellis-Hull C++ interface to the collector is included in
445the collector distribution. If you intend to use this, type
446"make c++" after the initial build of the collector is complete.
447See gc_cpp.h for the definition of the interface. This interface
448tries to approximate the Ellis-Detlefs C++ garbage collection
449proposal without compiler changes.
450
451Cautions:
4521. Arrays allocated without new placement syntax are
453allocated as uncollectable objects. They are traced by the
454collector, but will not be reclaimed.
455
4562. Failure to use "make c++" in combination with (1) will
457result in arrays allocated using the default new operator.
458This is likely to result in disaster without linker warnings.
459
4603. If your compiler supports an overloaded new[] operator,
461then gc_cpp.cc and gc_cpp.h should be suitably modified.
462
4634. Many current C++ compilers have deficiencies that
464break some of the functionality. See the comments in gc_cpp.h
465for suggested workarounds.
466
467USE AS LEAK DETECTOR:
468
469 The collector may be used to track down leaks in C programs that are
470intended to run with malloc/free (e.g. code with extreme real-time or
471portability constraints). To do so define FIND_LEAK in Makefile
472This will cause the collector to invoke the report_leak
473routine defined near the top of reclaim.c whenever an inaccessible
474object is found that has not been explicitly freed. Such objects will
475also be automatically reclaimed.
476 Productive use of this facility normally involves redefining report_leak
477to do something more intelligent. This typically requires annotating
478objects with additional information (e.g. creation time stack trace) that
479identifies their origin. Such code is typically not very portable, and is
480not included here, except on SPARC machines.
481 If all objects are allocated with GC_DEBUG_MALLOC (see next section),
482then the default version of report_leak will report the source file
483and line number at which the leaked object was allocated. This may
484sometimes be sufficient. (On SPARC/SUNOS4 machines, it will also report
485a cryptic stack trace. This can often be turned into a sympolic stack
486trace by invoking program "foo" with "callprocs foo". Callprocs is
487a short shell script that invokes adb to expand program counter values
488to symbolic addresses. It was largely supplied by Scott Schwartz.)
489 Note that the debugging facilities described in the next section can
490sometimes be slightly LESS effective in leak finding mode, since in
491leak finding mode, GC_debug_free actually results in reuse of the object.
492(Otherwise the object is simply marked invalid.) Also note that the test
493program is not designed to run meaningfully in FIND_LEAK mode.
494Use "make gc.a" to build the collector.
495
496DEBUGGING FACILITIES:
497
498 The routines GC_debug_malloc, GC_debug_malloc_atomic, GC_debug_realloc,
499and GC_debug_free provide an alternate interface to the collector, which
500provides some help with memory overwrite errors, and the like.
501Objects allocated in this way are annotated with additional
502information. Some of this information is checked during garbage
503collections, and detected inconsistencies are reported to stderr.
504
505 Simple cases of writing past the end of an allocated object should
506be caught if the object is explicitly deallocated, or if the
507collector is invoked while the object is live. The first deallocation
508of an object will clear the debugging info associated with an
509object, so accidentally repeated calls to GC_debug_free will report the
510deallocation of an object without debugging information. Out of
511memory errors will be reported to stderr, in addition to returning
512NIL.
513
514 GC_debug_malloc checking during garbage collection is enabled
515with the first call to GC_debug_malloc. This will result in some
516slowdown during collections. If frequent heap checks are desired,
517this can be achieved by explicitly invoking GC_gcollect, e.g. from
518the debugger.
519
520 GC_debug_malloc allocated objects should not be passed to GC_realloc
521or GC_free, and conversely. It is however acceptable to allocate only
522some objects with GC_debug_malloc, and to use GC_malloc for other objects,
523provided the two pools are kept distinct. In this case, there is a very
524low probablility that GC_malloc allocated objects may be misidentified as
525having been overwritten. This should happen with probability at most
526one in 2**32. This probability is zero if GC_debug_malloc is never called.
527
528 GC_debug_malloc, GC_malloc_atomic, and GC_debug_realloc take two
529additional trailing arguments, a string and an integer. These are not
530interpreted by the allocator. They are stored in the object (the string is
531not copied). If an error involving the object is detected, they are printed.
532
533 The macros GC_MALLOC, GC_MALLOC_ATOMIC, GC_REALLOC, GC_FREE, and
534GC_REGISTER_FINALIZER are also provided. These require the same arguments
535as the corresponding (nondebugging) routines. If gc.h is included
536with GC_DEBUG defined, they call the debugging versions of these
537functions, passing the current file name and line number as the two
538extra arguments, where appropriate. If gc.h is included without GC_DEBUG
539defined, then all these macros will instead be defined to their nondebugging
540equivalents. (GC_REGISTER_FINALIZER is necessary, since pointers to
541objects with debugging information are really pointers to a displacement
542of 16 bytes form the object beginning, and some translation is necessary
543when finalization routines are invoked. For details, about what's stored
544in the header, see the definition of the type oh in debug_malloc.c)
545
546INCREMENTAL/GENERATIONAL COLLECTION:
547
548The collector normally interrupts client code for the duration of
549a garbage collection mark phase. This may be unacceptable if interactive
550response is needed for programs with large heaps. The collector
551can also run in a "generational" mode, in which it usually attempts to
552collect only objects allocated since the last garbage collection.
553Furthermore, in this mode, garbage collections run mostly incrementally,
554with a small amount of work performed in response to each of a large number of
555GC_malloc requests.
556
557This mode is enabled by a call to GC_enable_incremental().
558
559Incremental and generational collection is effective in reducing
560pause times only if the collector has some way to tell which objects
561or pages have been recently modified. The collector uses two sources
562of information:
563
5641. Information provided by the VM system. This may be provided in
565one of several forms. Under Solaris 2.X (and potentially under other
566similar systems) information on dirty pages can be read from the
567/proc file system. Under other systems (currently SunOS4.X) it is
568possible to write-protect the heap, and catch the resulting faults.
569On these systems we require that system calls writing to the heap
570(other than read) be handled specially by client code.
571See os_dep.c for details.
572
5732. Information supplied by the programmer. We define "stubborn"
574objects to be objects that are rarely changed. Such an object
575can be allocated (and enabled for writing) with GC_malloc_stubborn.
576Once it has been initialized, the collector should be informed with
577a call to GC_end_stubborn_change. Subsequent writes that store
578pointers into the object must be preceded by a call to
579GC_change_stubborn.
580
581This mechanism performs best for objects that are written only for
582initialization, and such that only one stubborn object is writable
583at once. It is typically not worth using for short-lived
584objects. Stubborn objects are treated less efficiently than pointerfree
585(atomic) objects.
586
587A rough rule of thumb is that, in the absence of VM information, garbage
588collection pauses are proportional to the amount of pointerful storage
589plus the amount of modified "stubborn" storage that is reachable during
590the collection.
591
592Initial allocation of stubborn objects takes longer than allocation
593of other objects, since other data structures need to be maintained.
594
595We recommend against random use of stubborn objects in client
596code, since bugs caused by inappropriate writes to stubborn objects
597are likely to be very infrequently observed and hard to trace.
598However, their use may be appropriate in a few carefully written
599library routines that do not make the objects themselves available
600for writing by client code.
601
602
603BUGS:
604
605 Any memory that does not have a recognizable pointer to it will be
606reclaimed. Exclusive-or'ing forward and backward links in a list
607doesn't cut it.
608 Some C optimizers may lose the last undisguised pointer to a memory
609object as a consequence of clever optimizations. This has almost
610never been observed in practice. Send mail to boehm@acm.org
611for suggestions on how to fix your compiler.
612 This is not a real-time collector. In the standard configuration,
613percentage of time required for collection should be constant across
614heap sizes. But collection pauses will increase for larger heaps.
615(On SPARCstation 2s collection times will be on the order of 300 msecs
616per MB of accessible memory that needs to be scanned. Your mileage
617may vary.) The incremental/generational collection facility helps,
618but is portable only if "stubborn" allocation is used.
619 Please address bug reports to boehm@acm.org. If you are
620contemplating a major addition, you might also send mail to ask whether
621it's already been done (or whether we tried and discarded it).
622