]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/gcc.git/blob - libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/pb_ds/lu_based_containers.html
pb_assoc: Delete.
[thirdparty/gcc.git] / libstdc++-v3 / docs / html / ext / pb_ds / lu_based_containers.html
1 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
2 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
3
4 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
5 <head>
6 <meta name="generator" content=
7 "HTML Tidy for Linux/x86 (vers 12 April 2005), see www.w3.org" />
8
9 <title>List-Based Containers</title>
10 <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content=
11 "text/html; charset=us-ascii" />
12 </head>
13
14 <body>
15 <div id="page">
16 <h1>List-Update Design</h1>
17
18 <h2><a name="overview" id="overview">Overview</a></h2>
19
20 <p>The list-based container has the following declaration:</p>
21 <pre>
22 <b>template</b>&lt;
23 <b>typename</b> Key,
24 <b>typename</b> Mapped,
25 <b>typename</b> Eq_Fn = std::equal_to&lt;Key&gt;,
26 <b>typename</b> Update_Policy = <a href=
27 "move_to_front_lu_policy.html">move_to_front_lu_policy&lt;&gt;</a>,
28 <b>typename</b> Allocator = std::allocator&lt;<b>char</b>&gt; &gt;
29 <b>class</b> <a href="list_update.html">list_update</a>;
30 </pre>
31
32 <p>The parameters have the following meaning:</p>
33
34 <ol>
35 <li><tt>Key</tt> is the key type.</li>
36
37 <li><tt>Mapped</tt> is the mapped-policy, and is explained in
38 <a href="tutorial.html#assoc_ms">Tutorial::Associative
39 Containers::Associative Containers Others than Maps</a>.</li>
40
41 <li><tt>Eq_Fn</tt> is a key equivalence functor.</li>
42
43 <li><tt>Update_Policy</tt> is a policy updating positions in
44 the list based on access patterns. It is described in the
45 following subsection.</li>
46
47 <li><tt>Allocator</tt> is an allocator
48 type.</li>
49 </ol>
50
51 <p>A list-based associative container is a container that
52 stores elements in a linked-list. It does not order the
53 elements by any particular order related to the keys.
54 List-based containers are primarily useful for creating
55 "multimaps" (see <a href=
56 "motivation.html#assoc_mapping_semantics">Motivation::Associative
57 Containers::Avoiding Multiple Keys</a> and <a href=
58 "tutorial.html#assoc_ms">Tutorial::Associative
59 Containers::Associative Containers Others than Maps</a>). In
60 fact, list-based containers are designed in <tt>pb_ds</tt>
61 expressly for this purpose. This is explained further in
62 <a href="#mmaps">Use for "Multimaps"</a>.</p>
63
64 <p>List-based containers might also be useful for some rare
65 cases, where a key is encapsulated to the extent that only
66 key-equivalence can be tested. Hash-based containers need to
67 know how to transform a key into a size type, and tree-based
68 containers need to know if some key is larger than another.
69 List-based associative containers, conversely, only need to
70 know if two keys are equivalent.</p>
71
72 <p>Since a list-based associative container does not order
73 elements by keys, is it possible to order the list in some
74 useful manner? Remarkably, many on-line competitive [<a href=
75 "references.html#motwani95random">motwani95random</a>]
76 algorithms exist for reordering lists to reflect access
77 prediction [<a href=
78 "references.html#andrew04mtf">andrew04mtf</a>].</p>
79
80 <h2><a name="list_updates" id="list_updates">List
81 Updates</a></h2>
82
83 <h3><a name="general" id="general">General Terms</a></h3>
84
85 <p>Figure <a href="#simple_list">A simple list</a> shows a
86 simple list of integer keys. If we search for the integer 6, we
87 are paying an overhead: the link with key 6 is only the fifth
88 link; if it were the first link, it could be accessed
89 faster.</p>
90
91 <h6 class="c1"><a name="simple_list" id="simple_list"><img src=
92 "simple_list.png" alt="no image" /></a></h6>
93
94 <h6 class="c1">A simple list.</h6>
95
96 <p>List-update algorithms reorder lists as elements are
97 accessed. They try to determine, by the access history, which
98 keys to move to the front of the list. Some of these algorithms
99 require adding some metadata alongside each entry.</p>
100
101 <p>For example, Figure <a href="#lu">The counter algorithm</a>
102 -A shows the counter algorithm. Each node contains both a key
103 and a count metadata (shown in bold). When an element is
104 accessed (<i>e.g.</i> 6) its count is incremented, as shown in
105 Figure <a href="#lu">The counter algorithm</a> -B. If the count
106 reaches some predetermined value, say 10, as shown in Figure
107 <a href="#lu">The counter algorithm</a> -C, the count is set to
108 0 and the node is moved to the front of the list, as in Figure
109 <a href="#lu">The counter algorithm</a> -D.</p>
110
111 <h6 class="c1"><a name="lu" id="lu"><img src="lu.png" alt=
112 "no image" /></a></h6>
113
114 <h6 class="c1">The counter algorithm.</h6>
115
116 <h3><a name="imp_pb_ds" id="imp_pb_ds">Implementation</a></h3>
117
118 <p><tt>pb_ds</tt> allows instantiating lists with policies
119 implementing any algorithm moving nodes to the front of the
120 list (policies implementing algorithms interchanging nodes are
121 unsupported).</p>
122
123 <p>Associative containers based on lists are parametrized by a
124 <tt>Update_Policy</tt> parameter. This parameter defines the
125 type of metadata each node contains, how to create the
126 metadata, and how to decide, using this metadata, whether to
127 move a node to the front of the list. A list-based associative
128 container object derives (publicly) from its update policy.
129 Figure <a href="#update_policy_cd">A list and its update
130 policy</a> shows the scheme, as well as some predefined
131 policies (which are explained below).</p>
132
133 <h6 class="c1"><a name="update_policy_cd" id=
134 "update_policy_cd"><img src="update_policy_cd.png" alt=
135 "no image" /></a></h6>
136
137 <h6 class="c1">A list and its update policy.</h6>
138
139 <p>An instantiation of <tt>Update_Policy</tt> must define
140 internally <tt>update_metadata</tt> as the metadata it
141 requires. Internally, each node of the list contains, besides
142 the usual key and data, an instance of <tt><b>typename</b>
143 Update_Policy::update_metadata</tt>.</p>
144
145 <p>An instantiation of <tt>Update_Policy</tt> must define
146 internally two operators:</p>
147 <pre>
148 update_metadata
149 <b>operator</b>()();
150
151 <b>bool</b>
152 <b>operator</b>()(update_metadata &amp;);
153 </pre>
154
155 <p>The first is called by the container object, when creating a
156 new node, to create the node's metadata. The second is called
157 by the container object, when a node is accessed (<i>e.g.</i>,
158 when a find operation's key is equivalent to the key of the
159 node), to determine whether to move the node to the front of
160 the list.</p>
161
162 <p>The library contains two predefined implementations of
163 list-update policies [<a href=
164 "references.html#andrew04mtf">andrew04mtf</a>]. The first is
165 <a href=
166 "counter_lu_policy.html"><tt>counter_lu_policy</tt></a>, which
167 implements the counter algorithm described above. The second is
168 <a href=
169 "move_to_front_lu_policy.html"><tt>move_to_front_lu_policy</tt></a>,
170 which unconditionally move an accessed element to the front of
171 the list. The latter type is very useful in <tt>pb_ds</tt>,
172 since there is no need to associate metadata with each element
173 (this is explained further in <a href="#mmaps">Use for
174 "Multimaps"</a>).</p>
175
176 <h2><a name="mmaps" id="mmaps">Use for "Multimaps"</a></h2>
177
178 <p>In <tt>pb_ds</tt>, there are no equivalents for the STL's
179 multimaps and multisets; instead one uses an associative
180 container mapping primary keys to secondary keys (see <a href=
181 "motivation.html#assoc_mapping_semantics">Motivation::Associative
182 Containers::Alternative to Multiple Equivalent Keys</a> and
183 <a href="tutorial.html#assoc_ms">Tutorial::Associative
184 Containers::Associative Containers Others than Maps</a>).</p>
185
186 <p>List-based containers are especially useful as associative
187 containers for secondary keys. In fact, they are implemented
188 here expressly for this purpose.</p>
189
190 <p>To begin with, these containers use very little per-entry
191 structure memory overhead, since they can be implemented as
192 singly-linked lists. (Arrays use even lower per-entry memory
193 overhead, but they are less flexible in moving around entries,
194 and have weaker invalidation guarantees).</p>
195
196 <p>More importantly, though, list-based containers use very
197 little per-container memory overhead. The memory overhead of an
198 empty list-based container is practically that of a pointer.
199 This is important for when they are used as secondary
200 associative-containers in situations where the average ratio of
201 secondary keys to primary keys is low (or even 1).</p>
202
203 <p>In order to reduce the per-container memory overhead as much
204 as possible, they are implemented as closely as possible to
205 singly-linked lists.</p>
206
207 <ol>
208 <li>List-based containers do not store internally the number
209 of values that they hold. This means that their <tt>size</tt>
210 method has linear complexity (just like <tt>std::list</tt>).
211 Note that finding the number of equivalent-key values in an
212 STL multimap also has linear complexity (because it must be
213 done, <i>e.g.</i>, via <tt>std::distance</tt> of the
214 multimap's <tt>equal_range</tt> method), but usually with
215 higher constants.</li>
216
217 <li>Most associative-container objects each hold a policy
218 object (<i>e.g.</i>, a hash-based container object holds a
219 hash functor). List-based containers, conversely, only have
220 class-wide policy objects.</li>
221 </ol>
222
223 <p>See also <a href=
224 "assoc_performance_tests.html#msc">Associative-Container
225 Performance Tests::Observations::Mapping-Semantics
226 Considerations</a>.</p>
227 </div>
228 </body>
229 </html>