1 .\" Copyright (C) 2017 Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
3 .\" SPDX-License-Identifier: Linux-man-pages-copyleft
5 .TH BZERO 3 2021-03-22 "Linux man-pages (unreleased)" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
7 bzero, explicit_bzero \- zero a byte string
10 .RI ( libc ", " \-lc )
13 .B #include <strings.h>
15 .BI "void bzero(void *" s ", size_t " n );
17 .B #include <string.h>
19 .BI "void explicit_bzero(void *" s ", size_t " n );
24 function erases the data in the
26 bytes of the memory starting at the location pointed to by
28 by writing zeros (bytes containing \(aq\e0\(aq) to that area.
32 function performs the same task as
36 in that it guarantees that compiler optimizations will not remove the
37 erase operation if the compiler deduces that the operation is "unnecessary".
42 first appeared in glibc 2.25.
44 For an explanation of the terms used in this section, see
52 Interface Attribute Value
56 T} Thread safety MT-Safe
64 function is deprecated (marked as LEGACY in POSIX.1-2001); use
67 POSIX.1-2008 removes the specification of
71 function first appeared in 4.3BSD.
75 function is a nonstandard extension that is also present on some of the BSDs.
76 Some other implementations have a similar function, such as
77 .BR memset_explicit ()
83 function addresses a problem that security-conscious applications
84 may run into when using
86 if the compiler can deduce that the location to be zeroed will
87 never again be touched by a
89 program, then it may remove the
92 This is a problem if the intent of the
94 call was to erase sensitive data (e.g., passwords)
95 to prevent the possibility that the data was leaked
96 by an incorrect or compromised program.
99 are never optimized away by the compiler.
102 .BR explicit_bzero ()
103 function does not solve all problems associated with erasing sensitive data:
106 .BR explicit_bzero ()
109 guarantee that sensitive data is completely erased from memory.
112 For example, there may be copies of the sensitive data in
113 a register and in "scratch" stack areas.
115 .BR explicit_bzero ()
116 function is not aware of these copies, and can't erase them.
118 In some circumstances,
119 .BR explicit_bzero ()
123 If the compiler determined that the variable containing the
124 sensitive data could be optimized to be stored in a register
125 (because it is small enough to fit in a register,
126 and no operation other than the
127 .BR explicit_bzero ()
128 call would need to take the address of the variable), then the
129 .BR explicit_bzero ()
130 call will force the data to be copied from the register
131 to a location in RAM that is then immediately erased
132 (while the copy in the register remains unaffected).
133 The problem here is that data in RAM is more likely to be exposed
134 by a bug than data in a register, and thus the
135 .BR explicit_bzero ()
136 call creates a brief time window where the sensitive data is more
137 vulnerable than it would otherwise have been
138 if no attempt had been made to erase the data.
140 Note that declaring the sensitive variable with the
144 eliminate the above problems.
145 Indeed, it will make them worse, since, for example,
146 it may force a variable that would otherwise have been optimized
147 into a register to instead be maintained in (more vulnerable)
148 RAM for its entire lifetime.
150 Notwithstanding the above details, for security-conscious applications, using
151 .BR explicit_bzero ()
152 is generally preferable to not using it.
154 .BR explicit_bzero ()
155 anticipate that future compilers will recognize calls to
156 .BR explicit_bzero ()
157 and take steps to ensure that all copies of the sensitive data are erased,
158 including copies in registers or in "scratch" stack areas.