2 .\" Copyright (C) 2017 Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
4 .\" SPDX-License-Identifier: Linux-man-pages-copyleft
6 .TH bzero 3 (date) "Linux man-pages (unreleased)"
8 bzero, explicit_bzero \- zero a byte string
11 .RI ( libc ", " \-lc )
14 .B #include <strings.h>
16 .BI "void bzero(void " s [. n "], size_t " n );
18 .B #include <string.h>
20 .BI "void explicit_bzero(void " s [. n "], size_t " n );
25 function erases the data in the
27 bytes of the memory starting at the location pointed to by
29 by writing zeros (bytes containing \[aq]\e0\[aq]) to that area.
33 function performs the same task as
37 in that it guarantees that compiler optimizations will not remove the
38 erase operation if the compiler deduces that the operation is "unnecessary".
42 For an explanation of the terms used in this section, see
48 Interface Attribute Value
54 T} Thread safety MT-Safe
66 function is a nonstandard extension that is also present on some of the BSDs.
67 Some other implementations have a similar function, such as
68 .BR memset_explicit ()
75 Marked as LEGACY in POSIX.1-2001.
76 Removed in POSIX.1-2008.
80 function addresses a problem that security-conscious applications
81 may run into when using
83 if the compiler can deduce that the location to be zeroed will
84 never again be touched by a
86 program, then it may remove the
89 This is a problem if the intent of the
91 call was to erase sensitive data (e.g., passwords)
92 to prevent the possibility that the data was leaked
93 by an incorrect or compromised program.
96 are never optimized away by the compiler.
100 function does not solve all problems associated with erasing sensitive data:
103 .BR explicit_bzero ()
106 guarantee that sensitive data is completely erased from memory.
109 For example, there may be copies of the sensitive data in
110 a register and in "scratch" stack areas.
112 .BR explicit_bzero ()
113 function is not aware of these copies, and can't erase them.
115 In some circumstances,
116 .BR explicit_bzero ()
120 If the compiler determined that the variable containing the
121 sensitive data could be optimized to be stored in a register
122 (because it is small enough to fit in a register,
123 and no operation other than the
124 .BR explicit_bzero ()
125 call would need to take the address of the variable), then the
126 .BR explicit_bzero ()
127 call will force the data to be copied from the register
128 to a location in RAM that is then immediately erased
129 (while the copy in the register remains unaffected).
130 The problem here is that data in RAM is more likely to be exposed
131 by a bug than data in a register, and thus the
132 .BR explicit_bzero ()
133 call creates a brief time window where the sensitive data is more
134 vulnerable than it would otherwise have been
135 if no attempt had been made to erase the data.
137 Note that declaring the sensitive variable with the
141 eliminate the above problems.
142 Indeed, it will make them worse, since, for example,
143 it may force a variable that would otherwise have been optimized
144 into a register to instead be maintained in (more vulnerable)
145 RAM for its entire lifetime.
147 Notwithstanding the above details, for security-conscious applications, using
148 .BR explicit_bzero ()
149 is generally preferable to not using it.
151 .BR explicit_bzero ()
152 anticipate that future compilers will recognize calls to
153 .BR explicit_bzero ()
154 and take steps to ensure that all copies of the sensitive data are erased,
155 including copies in registers or in "scratch" stack areas.