+ <para>Note that systemd will refuse reception of status updates from this command unless
+ <varname>NotifyAccess=</varname> is set for the service unit this command is called from.</para>
+
+ <para>Note that <function>sd_notify()</function> notifications may be attributed to units correctly only if either
+ the sending process is still around at the time PID 1 processes the message, or if the sending process is
+ explicitly runtime-tracked by the service manager. The latter is the case if the service manager originally forked
+ off the process, i.e. on all processes that match <varname>NotifyAccess=</varname><option>main</option> or
+ <varname>NotifyAccess=</varname><option>exec</option>. Conversely, if an auxiliary process of the unit sends an
+ <function>sd_notify()</function> message and immediately exits, the service manager might not be able to properly
+ attribute the message to the unit, and thus will ignore it, even if <varname>NotifyAccess=</varname><option>all
+ </option> is set for it. When <option>--no-block</option> is used, all synchronization for reception of notifications
+ is disabled, and hence the aforementioned race may occur if the invoking process is not the service manager or spawned
+ by the service manager.</para>
+
+ <para>Hence, <command>systemd-notify</command> will first attempt to invoke <function>sd_notify()</function>
+ pretending to have the PID of the invoking process. This will only succeed when invoked with sufficient privileges.
+ On failure, it will then fall back to invoking it under its own PID. This behaviour is useful in order that when
+ the tool is invoked from a shell script the shell process — and not the <command>systemd-notify</command> process
+ — appears as sender of the message, which in turn is helpful if the shell process is the main process of a service,
+ due to the limitations of <varname>NotifyAccess=</varname><option>all</option>. Use the <option>--pid=</option>
+ switch to tweak this behaviour.</para>