libext2fs: don't error out when punching a totally sparse file

If we're asked to punch a file with no data blocks mapped to it and a
non-zero length, we don't need to do any work in ext2fs_punch_extent()
and can return success.  Unfortunately, the extent_get() function
returns "no current node" because it (correctly) failed to find any
extents, which is bubbled up to callers.  Since no extents being found
is not an error in this corner case, fix up ext2fs_punch_extent() to
return 0 to callers.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/punch.c b/lib/ext2fs/punch.c
index 9dfba2eb65ead17eea38c43b4c732f8711a1a6f5..ff051f730ff25443709ddf6ddc424f16d5ea38d0 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/ext2fs/punch.c
+++ b/lib/ext2fs/punch.c
@@ -198,10 +198,17 @@ static errcode_t ext2fs_punch_extent(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t ino,
         * next-lowest extent if 'start' is in a hole, and doesn't set a
         * current node if there was a real error reading the extent tree.
         * In that case, _get() will error out.
+        *
+        * Note: If _get() returns 'no current node', that simply means that
+        * there aren't any blocks mapped past this point in the file, so we're
+        * done.
         */
        ext2fs_extent_goto(handle, start);
        retval = ext2fs_extent_get(handle, EXT2_EXTENT_CURRENT, &extent);
-       if (retval)
+       if (retval == EXT2_ET_NO_CURRENT_NODE) {
+               retval = 0;
+               goto errout;
+       } else if (retval)
                goto errout;
        while (1) {
                op = EXT2_EXTENT_NEXT_LEAF;