Theodore Ts'o:
I'll add that I've never been convinced that the mkfs front end is all
that useful. It's probably better for people to explicitly run
/sbin/mkfs.xfs, /sbin/mkfs.ext4, etc.., so you don't have to worry
about which options get passed down to the file system specific mkfs
program, and which ones are interpreted by /sbin/mkfs --- and I don't
believe /sbin/mkfs adds enough (err, any?) value that using
"/sbin/mkfs -t xxx" vs "/sbin/mkfs.xxx" makes any sense whatsoever.
... and I absolutely agree.
Reported-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
deprecated utils are in maintenance mode and we keep them in source tree for
backward compatibility only.
+What: mkfs
+Why: use filesystem specific mkfs.<type>.
+
What: fdisk -s <device>
Why: this does not belong to fdisk, use "blockdev --getsz"
.RB [ \-t
.IR type "] [" fs-options ] " device " [ size ]
.SH DESCRIPTION
+.B This mkfs frontend is deprecated in favour of filesystem specific mkfs.<type> utils.
+.PP
.B mkfs
is used to build a Linux filesystem on a device, usually
a hard disk partition. The