something is not quite right, and you are unwilling to fix the
issue.
+Patching process
+
+ * Tell in mail list when you are going to work with some particular
+ piece of code for long time. This helps other to avoid massive
+ merge conflicts. Small or quick work does not need to be
+ announced.
+
+ * Submit only changes that you think are ready to merge. If you only
+ want change review tell your intention clearly in change cover
+ letter, and/or in each patch subject to review-only.
+
+ * When getting comments align the changes with them. Resubmission
+ without changes is as good as ignoring advice, and is neither
+ recommended nor polite.
+
+ * Resubmission can be partial or complete. If only few alterations
+ are needed here and there resubmit particular patches. When
+ comments cause greater effect resubmit everything again.
+
+ * All patch submissions, big or small, are either commented, reject,
+ or merge. When maintainer rejects a patch (series) it is pointless
+ to resubmit.
+
Various notes
* The util-linux does not use kernel headers for file system super