install: Use AE spelling for "behavior"

gcc:
	* doc/install.texi (Configuration): Use AE spelling for "behavior".

diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
index 406862b31958b1f401aac79c0bd5156738393bfb..5ce11ac3c0cb03bbdded9027777d09424585ff81 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/install.texi
@@ -1886,12 +1886,12 @@ On MIPS targets, make @option{-mlxc1-sxc1} the default when no
 On MIPS targets, make @option{-mno-lxc1-sxc1} the default when no
 @option{-mlxc1-sxc1} option is passed.  The indexed load/store
 instructions are not directly a problem but can lead to unexpected
-behaviour when deployed in an application intended for a 32-bit address
+behavior when deployed in an application intended for a 32-bit address
 space but run on a 64-bit processor.  The issue is seen because all
 known MIPS 64-bit Linux kernels execute o32 and n32 applications
-with 64-bit addressing enabled which affects the overflow behaviour
+with 64-bit addressing enabled which affects the overflow behavior
 of the indexed addressing mode.  GCC will assume that ordinary
-32-bit arithmetic overflow behaviour is the same whether performed
+32-bit arithmetic overflow behavior is the same whether performed
 as an @code{addu} instruction or as part of the address calculation
 in @code{lwxc1} type instructions.  This assumption holds true in a
 pure 32-bit environment and can hold true in a 64-bit environment if