Where we should use anon_bpf_map_data, anon_bpf_prog_data was used.
Fortunately, this has not been a big trouble because anon_bpf_map_data
and anon_bpf_prog_data had no difference in their member layout
Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <yamato@redhat.com>
size_t column_index __attribute__((__unused__)),
char **str)
{
- struct anon_bpf_prog_data *data = (struct anon_bpf_prog_data *)unkn->anon_data;
+ struct anon_bpf_map_data *data = (struct anon_bpf_map_data *)unkn->anon_data;
const char *t;
switch(column_id) {