This was newly failing because it was checking for a value *without* the
LSB set. In a recent commit we have fixed the bug which lost the LSB,
and that caused this test to fail.
Here we use the new testsuite implementation to test for "one plus the
location" rather than "one of the values A, B, C, ...", which is a
better representation of what we're trying to check.
#objdump: -dw
#source: ifunc-2.s
+#record: INDIRECT_LOC FOO_LOCATION
#...
-0+(130|1a0|1c8|1e0) <foo>:
+0+([0-9a-f]{3}).*0x([0-9a-f]{3})@plt>:
#...
-[ \t0-9a-f]+:[ \t0-9a-f]+bl[ \t0-9a-f]+<\*ABS\*\+0x(130|1a0|1c8|1e0)@plt>
+Disassembly of section \.text:
+
+#check: FOO_LOC string tolower $FOO_LOCATION
+#check: INDIRECT_POS format %x [expr "0x$INDIRECT_LOC + 1"]
+0+FOO_LOC <foo>:
+#...
+[ \t0-9a-f]+:[ \t0-9a-f]+bl[ \t0-9a-f]+<\*ABS\*\+0xFOO_LOC@plt>
[ \t0-9a-f]+:[ \t0-9a-f]+adrp[ \t]+c0, 0 <.*>
-[ \t0-9a-f]+:[ \t0-9a-f]+add[ \t]+c0, c0, #0x(120|190|1b8|1d0)
+[ \t0-9a-f]+:[ \t0-9a-f]+add[ \t]+c0, c0, #0xINDIRECT_POS
#pass