In two places in glibc, -Wextra produces implicit-fallthrough warnings
where there are comments about the fall-through but their wording
doesn't match one of the forms expected by the default
implicit-fallthrough level. This patch adjusts those two places to
have a comment in a form that is accepted, so avoiding the warning
(this seems preferable to only being able to use a looser level of the
warning that allows any comment at all as evidence of deliberate
fall-through).
Tested for x86_64.
* iconvdata/cns11643.h (ucs4_to_cns11643): Adjust fall-through
comment wording.
* nis/nis_call.c (__do_niscall3): Likewise.
2019-02-13 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
+ * iconvdata/cns11643.h (ucs4_to_cns11643): Adjust fall-through
+ comment wording.
+ * nis/nis_call.c (__do_niscall3): Likewise.
+
* catgets/gencat.c (normalize_line): Use braces around empty
'else' body.
* include/stap-probe.h [!USE_STAP_PROBE && !__ASSEMBLER__]
cp = __cns11643l1_from_ucs4_tab12[ch - 0x4e00];
if (cp[0] != '\0')
break;
- /* FALLTHROUGH. Let's try the other planes. */
+ /* Let's try the other planes. */
+ /* Fall through. */
case 0x3400 ... 0x4dff:
case 0x9f9d ... 0x9fa5:
/* Let's try the other planes. */
}
/* Yes, the missing break is correct. If we doesn't have to
start a callback, look if we have to search another server */
+ /* Fall through. */
case NIS_LOOKUP:
case NIS_ADD:
case NIS_MODIFY: