If time_t is a signed 32-bit integer, then we cannot represent times
after 03:14:07 on 2038-01-19. Indicating an error if (Year > 2038) is
not sufficient; for safety, we need to bail if (Year >= 2038).
As the comment above this line notes, it would be better to check if
time_t is 32 bits first. And even if we didn't check for that, we could
use a much more complicated check:
((Year > 2038) || ((Year == 2038) && (Month > 1)) ||
((Year == 2038) && (Month == 1) && (Day >= 19)))
But I don't think the additional complexity is worth it; rejecting any
dates in 2038 eliminates fewer than 3 weeks of potentially-valid dates.
Reported by: Rasmus Villemoes
? 29 : 28;
/* Checking for 2038 bogusly assumes that time_t is 32 bits. But
I'm too lazy to try to check for time_t overflow in another way. */
- if (Year < EPOCH || Year > 2038
+ if (Year < EPOCH || Year >= 2038
|| Month < 1 || Month > 12
/* Lint fluff: "conversion from long may lose accuracy" */
|| Day < 1 || Day > DaysInMonth[(int)--Month]