If the "systemctl start" happens at an "unlucky" time such as 1000.9 seconds
and then e. g. runs for 2.6 s (sleep 2 plus the overhead of starting the unit
and waiting for it) the END_SEC would be 1003.5s which would round to 1004,
making the difference 4. On busier testbeds the overhead apparently can take a
bit more than 0.5s. The main point is really that it doesn't wait that much
longer, so "-le 4" seems perfectly fine. We allow up to 1.5s in the subsequent
"wait5fail" test below too.
Fixes #4582
systemctl start --wait wait2.service || exit 1
END_SEC=$(date -u '+%s')
ELAPSED=$(($END_SEC-$START_SEC))
-[[ "$ELAPSED" -ge 2 ]] && [[ "$ELAPSED" -le 3 ]] || exit 1
+[[ "$ELAPSED" -ge 2 ]] && [[ "$ELAPSED" -le 4 ]] || exit 1
# wait5fail fails, so systemctl should fail
START_SEC=$(date -u '+%s')