]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git/blame - gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/signals.exp
2004-05-10 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
[thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / testsuite / gdb.base / signals.exp
CommitLineData
bea71854 1# Copyright 1997, 1998, 1999, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
c906108c
SS
2
3# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
4# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
5# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
6# (at your option) any later version.
7#
8# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
9# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
10# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
11# GNU General Public License for more details.
12#
13# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
14# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
15# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
16
17# Please email any bugs, comments, and/or additions to this file to:
18# bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu
19
20if [target_info exists gdb,nosignals] {
21 verbose "Skipping signals.exp because of nosignals."
22 continue
23}
24
25if $tracelevel then {
26 strace $tracelevel
27}
28
29set prms_id 0
30set bug_id 0
31
32set testfile signals
33set srcfile ${testfile}.c
34set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
35if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug}] != "" } {
36 gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
37}
38
39# Create and source the file that provides information about the compiler
40# used to compile the test case.
41if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] {
42 return -1;
43}
44
085dd6e6
JM
45if {$hp_cc_compiler} {
46 set void 0
47} else {
48 set void void
49}
50
c906108c
SS
51proc signal_tests_1 {} {
52 global gdb_prompt
53 if [runto_main] then {
54 gdb_test "next" "signal \\(SIGUSR1.*" \
55 "next over signal (SIGALRM, handler)"
56 gdb_test "next" "alarm \\(.*" \
57 "next over signal (SIGUSR1, handler)"
58 gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* first \\*/" \
59 "next over alarm (1)"
60 # An alarm has been signaled, give the signal time to get delivered.
61 sleep 2
62
d303a6c7
AC
63 # NOTE: cagney/2004-05-09: The following is retained as an
64 # historical reference. Because signal delivery when doing a
65 # next has been changed to use a continue, and not a
66 # single-step, the kernel bug of a stuck trace-bit in the
67 # trampoline's saved PS register is avoided.
68
69 # This can happen on machines that have a trace flag in their
70 # PS register. The trace flag in the PS register will be set
71 # due to the `next' command. Before calling the signal
72 # handler, the PS register is pushed along with the context on
73 # the user stack. When the signal handler has finished, it
74 # reenters the the kernel via a sigreturn syscall, which
75 # restores the PS register along with the context. If the
76 # kernel erroneously does not clear the trace flag in the
77 # pushed context, gdb will receive a SIGTRAP from the set
78 # trace flag in the restored context after the signal handler
79 # has finished.
80
81 # I do not yet understand why the SIGTRAP does not occur after
82 # stepping the instruction at the restored PC on i386 BSDI 1.0
83 # systems.
84
85 # Note that the vax under Ultrix also exhibits this behaviour
86 # (it is uncovered by the `continue from a break in a signal
87 # handler' test below). With this test the failure is
88 # shadowed by hitting the through_sigtramp_breakpoint upon
89 # return from the signal handler.
90
91 # SVR4 and Linux based i*86 systems exhibit this behaviour as
92 # well (it is uncovered by the `continue from a break in a
93 # signal handler' test below). As these systems use procfs,
94 # where we tell the kernel not to tell gdb about `pass'
95 # signals, and the trace flag is cleared by the kernel before
96 # entering the sigtramp routine, GDB will not notice the
97 # execution of the signal handler. Upon return from the
98 # signal handler, GDB will receive a SIGTRAP from the set
99 # trace flag in the restored context. The SIGTRAP marks the
100 # end of a (albeit long winded) single step for GDB, causing
101 # this test to pass.
102
103 gdb_test "next" "alarm .*" "next to 2nd alarm"
c906108c
SS
104
105 gdb_test "break handler" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
106 gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* second \\*/" \
107 "next to 2nd ++count in signals_tests_1"
108 # An alarm has been signaled, give the signal time to get delivered.
109 sleep 2
110
111 set bash_bug 0
112 send_gdb "next\n"
113 gdb_expect {
114 -re "Breakpoint.*handler.*$gdb_prompt $" {
115 pass "next to handler in signals_tests_1"
116 }
117 -re "Program received signal SIGEMT.*$gdb_prompt $" {
118 # Bash versions before 1.13.5 cause this behaviour
119 # by blocking SIGTRAP.
120 fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1 (known problem with bash versions before 1.13.5)"
121 set bash_bug 1
122 gdb_test "signal 0" "Breakpoint.*handler.*"
123 }
124 -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1" }
125 timeout { fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1 (timeout)" }
126 eof { fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1 (eof)" }
127 }
128
129 # This doesn't test that main is frame #2, just that main is frame
130 # #2, #3, or higher. At some point this should be fixed (but
131 # it quite possibly would introduce new FAILs on some systems).
a0b3c4fd 132 setup_xfail "i*86-*-bsdi2.0"
bea71854 133 gdb_test "backtrace 10" "#0.*handler.*#1.*signal handler.*#2.* main .*" \
c906108c
SS
134 "backtrace in signals_tests_1"
135
136 gdb_test "break func1" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
137 gdb_test "break func2" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
138
d303a6c7
AC
139 # NOTE: cagney/2004-05-09: Ref "next to 2nd alarm" above.
140 # Because signal delivery when doing a next has been changed
141 # to use a continue, and not a single-step, the kernel bug of
142 # a stuck trace-bit in the trampoline's saved PS register is
143 # avoided.
c906108c 144
d303a6c7 145 gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*func1.*" "continue to func1"
c906108c
SS
146
147 setup_xfail "*-*-irix*"
148 send_gdb "signal SIGUSR1\n"
149 gdb_expect {
150 -re "Breakpoint.*handler.*$gdb_prompt $" { pass "signal SIGUSR1" }
151 -re "Program received signal SIGUSR1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
152 # This is what irix4 and irix5 do.
153 # It would appear to be a kernel bug.
154 fail "signal SIGUSR1"
155 gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*handler.*" "pass it SIGUSR1"
156 }
157 -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "signal SIGUSR1" }
158 default { fail "signal SIGUSR1" }
159 }
160
161 # Will tend to wrongly require an extra continue.
162
163 # The problem here is that the breakpoint at func1 will be
164 # inserted, and when the system finishes with the signal
165 # handler it will try to execute there. For GDB to try to
166 # remember that it was going to step over a breakpoint when a
167 # signal happened, distinguish this case from the case where
168 # func1 is called from the signal handler, etc., seems
169 # exceedingly difficult. So don't expect this to get fixed
170 # anytime soon.
171
172 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
173 send_gdb "continue\n"
174 gdb_expect {
175 -re "Breakpoint.*func2.*$gdb_prompt $" { pass "continue to func2" }
176 -re "Breakpoint.*func1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
177 fail "continue to func2"
178 gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*func2.*" \
179 "extra continue to func2"
180 }
181 -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "continue to func2" }
182 default { fail "continue to func2" }
183 }
184
185 sleep 2
186
187 # GDB yanks out the breakpoints to step over the breakpoint it
188 # stopped at, which means the breakpoint at handler is yanked.
189 # But if SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_P, we won't get another chance to
190 # reinsert them (at least not with procfs, where we tell the kernel
191 # not to tell gdb about `pass' signals). So the fix would appear to
192 # be to just yank that one breakpoint when we step over it.
193
194 setup_xfail "sparc*-*-*"
195 setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*"
196 setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"
197
198 # A faulty bash will not step the inferior into sigtramp on sun3.
199 if {$bash_bug} then {
200 setup_xfail "m68*-*-sunos4*"
201 }
202
203 setup_xfail "i*86-pc-linux-gnu*"
204 setup_xfail "i*86-*-solaris2*"
205 gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*handler.*" "continue to handler"
206
207 # If the SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_P failure happened, we have already
208 # exited.
209 # If we succeeded a continue will return from the handler to func2.
210 # GDB now has `forgotten' that it intended to step over the
211 # breakpoint at func2 and will stop at func2.
212 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
213 # The sun3 with a faulty bash will also be `forgetful' but it
214 # already got the spurious stop at func2 and this continue will work.
215 if {$bash_bug} then {
216 clear_xfail "m68*-*-sunos4*"
217 }
218 gdb_test "continue" "Program exited with code 010\\." \
219 "continue to exit in signals_tests_1 "
220 }
221}
222
223# On a few losing systems, ptrace (PT_CONTINUE) or ptrace (PT_STEP)
224# causes pending signals to be cleared, which causes these tests to
225# get nowhere fast. This is totally losing behavior (perhaps there
226# are cases in which is it useful but the user needs more control,
227# which they mostly have in GDB), but some people apparently think it
228# is a feature. It is documented in the ptrace manpage on Motorola
229# Delta Series sysV68 R3V7.1 and on HPUX 9.0. Even the non-HPUX PA
230# OSes (BSD and OSF/1) seem to have figured they had to copy this
231# braindamage.
232
233if {[ istarget "m68*-motorola-*" ] || [ istarget "hppa*-*-bsd*" ] ||
234 [ istarget "hppa*-*-osf*" ]} then {
235 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
236 fail "ptrace loses on signals on this target"
237 return 0
238}
239
240# lynx2.2.2 doesn't lose signals, instead it screws up the stack pointer
241# in some of these tests leading to massive problems. I've
242# reported this to lynx, hopefully it'll be fixed in lynx2.3.
243# Severe braindamage.
244if [ istarget "*-*-*lynx*" ] then {
245 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
246 fail "kernel scroggs stack pointer in signal tests on this target"
247 return 0
248}
249
250gdb_exit
251gdb_start
252
253# This will need to be updated as the exact list of signals changes,
254# but I want to test that TARGET_SIGNAL_0, TARGET_SIGNAL_DEFAULT, and
255# TARGET_SIGNAL_UNKNOWN are skipped.
256proc test_handle_all_print {} {
257 global timeout
258 # Increase timeout and expect input buffer for large output from gdb.
259 # Allow blank or TAB as whitespace characters.
260 set oldtimeout $timeout
261 set timeout [expr "$timeout + 360"]
262 verbose "Timeout is now $timeout seconds" 2
7a292a7a
SS
263 if { ![istarget "*-*-linux*"]
264 && ( [istarget "*-*-gnu*"]
265 || [istarget "*-*-mach*"] ) } {
c906108c
SS
266 gdb_test "handle all print" "Signal\[ \]+Stop\[ \]+Print\[ \]+Pass to program\[ \]+Description\r\nSIGHUP\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Hangup.*SIG63\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Real-time event 63.*EXC_BREAKPOINT\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Breakpoint"
267 } else {
104c1213 268 gdb_test "handle all print" "Signal\[ \]+Stop\[ \]+Print\[ \]+Pass to program\[ \]+Description\r\nSIGHUP\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Hangup.*SIG63\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Yes\[ \]+Real-time event 63.*"
c906108c
SS
269 }
270 set timeout $oldtimeout
271 verbose "Timeout restored to $timeout seconds" 2
272}
273test_handle_all_print
274
275gdb_exit
276gdb_start
277gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
278gdb_load $binfile
279signal_tests_1
280
281# Force a resync, so we're looking at the right prompt. On SCO we
282# were getting out of sync (I don't understand why).
283send_gdb "p 1+1\n"
284gdb_expect {
285 -re "= 2.*$gdb_prompt $" {}
286 -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { perror "sync trouble in signals.exp" }
287 default { perror "sync trouble in signals.exp" }
288}
289
290if [runto_main] then {
b7844da6
OF
291 # Since count is a static variable outside main, runto_main
292 # is no guarantee that count will be 0 at this point.
293 gdb_test "set variable count = 0" ""
c906108c
SS
294 gdb_test "break handler if 0" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
295 gdb_test "set \$handler_breakpoint_number = \$bpnum" ""
296
297 # Get to the point where a signal is waiting to be delivered
298 gdb_test "next" "signal \\(SIGUSR1.*" "next to signal in signals.exp"
299 gdb_test "next" "alarm \\(.*" "next to alarm #1 in signals.exp"
300 gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* first \\*/" \
301 "next to ++count #1 in signals.exp"
302 # Give the signal time to get delivered
303 sleep 2
304
305 # Now call a function. When GDB tries to run the stack dummy,
306 # it will hit the breakpoint at handler. Provided it doesn't
307 # lose its cool, this is not a problem, it just has to note
308 # that the breakpoint condition is false and keep going.
309
085dd6e6 310 gdb_test "p func1 ()" "^p func1 \\(\\)\r\n.\[0-9\]* = $void" \
c906108c
SS
311 "p func1 () #1 in signals.exp"
312
313 # Make sure the count got incremented.
314
315 # Haven't investigated this xfail
316 setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*"
317 setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"
318 gdb_test "p count" "= 2" "p count #1 in signals.exp"
319 if { [istarget "rs6000-*-*"] || [istarget "powerpc-*-*"] } { return 0 }
320
321 gdb_test "condition \$handler_breakpoint_number" "now unconditional\\."
322 gdb_test "next" "alarm \\(.*" "next to alarm #2 in signals.exp"
323 gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* second \\*/" \
324 "next to ++count #2 in signals.exp"
325 sleep 2
326
327 # This time we stop when GDB tries to run the stack dummy.
328 # So it is OK that we do not print the return value from the function.
329 gdb_test "p func1 ()" \
330"Breakpoint \[0-9\]*, handler.*
331The program being debugged stopped while in a function called from GDB.*" \
332 "p func1 () #2 in signals.exp"
333 # But we should be able to backtrace...
334 # On alpha-*-osf2.0 this test works when run manually but sometime fails when
335 # run under dejagnu, making it very hard to debug the problem. Weird...
bea71854 336 gdb_test "bt 10" "#0.*handler.*#1.*signal handler.*#2.* main .*" "bt in signals.exp"
c906108c
SS
337 # ...and continue...
338 gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\." "continue in signals.exp"
339 # ...and then count should have been incremented
340 gdb_test "p count" "= 5" "p count #2 in signals.exp"
341
342
343# Verify that "info signals" produces reasonable output.
344#
345 send_gdb "info signals\n"
346 gdb_expect {
347 -re "SIGHUP.*SIGINT.*SIGQUIT.*SIGILL.*SIGTRAP.*SIGABRT.*SIGEMT.*SIGFPE.*SIGKILL.*SIGBUS.*SIGSEGV.*SIGSYS.*SIGPIPE.*SIGALRM.*SIGTERM.*SIGURG.*SIGSTOP.*SIGTSTP.*SIGCONT.*SIGCHLD.*SIGTTIN.*SIGTTOU.*SIGIO.*SIGXCPU.*SIGXFSZ.*SIGVTALRM.*SIGPROF.*SIGWINCH.*SIGLOST.*SIGUSR1.*SIGUSR2.*SIGPWR.*SIGPOLL.*SIGWIND.*SIGPHONE.*SIGWAITING.*SIGLWP.*SIGDANGER.*SIGGRANT.*SIGRETRACT.*SIGMSG.*SIGSOUND.*SIGSAK.*SIGPRIO.*SIG33.*SIG34.*SIG35.*SIG36.*SIG37.*SIG38.*SIG39.*SIG40.*SIG41.*SIG42.*SIG43.*SIG44.*SIG45.*SIG46.*SIG47.*SIG48.*SIG49.*SIG50.*SIG51.*SIG52.*SIG53.*SIG54.*SIG55.*SIG56.*SIG57.*SIG58.*SIG59.*SIG60.*SIG61.*SIG62.*SIG63.*Use the \"handle\" command to change these tables.*$gdb_prompt $"\
348 {pass "info signals"}
349 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
350 {fail "info signals"}
351 timeout {fail "(timeout) info signals"}
352 }
353
354# Verify that "info signal" correctly handles an argument, be it a
355# symbolic signal name, or an integer ID.
356#
357 send_gdb "info signal SIGTRAP\n"
358 gdb_expect {
359 -re ".*SIGTRAP\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*No\[ \t\]*Trace/breakpoint trap.*$gdb_prompt $"\
360 {pass "info signal SIGTRAP"}
361 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
362 {fail "info signal SIGTRAP"}
363 timeout {fail "(timeout) info signal SIGTRAP"}
364 }
365
366 send_gdb "info signal 5\n"
367 gdb_expect {
368 -re ".*SIGTRAP\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*No\[ \t\]*Trace/breakpoint trap.*$gdb_prompt $"\
369 {pass "info signal 5"}
370 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
371 {fail "info signal 5"}
372 timeout {fail "(timeout) info signal 5"}
373 }
374
375# Verify that "handle" with illegal arguments is gracefully, um, handled.
376#
377 send_gdb "handle\n"
378 gdb_expect {
379 -re "Argument required .signal to handle.*$gdb_prompt $"\
380 {pass "handle without arguments"}
381 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
382 {fail "handle without arguments"}
383 timeout {fail "(timeout) handle without arguments"}
384 }
385
386 send_gdb "handle SIGFOO\n"
387 gdb_expect {
388 -re "Unrecognized or ambiguous flag word: \"SIGFOO\".*$gdb_prompt $"\
389 {pass "handle with bogus SIG"}
390 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
391 {fail "handle with bogus SIG"}
392 timeout {fail "(timeout) handle with bogus SIG"}
393 }
394
395 send_gdb "handle SIGHUP frump\n"
396 gdb_expect {
397 -re "Unrecognized or ambiguous flag word: \"frump\".*$gdb_prompt $"\
398 {pass "handle SIG with bogus action"}
399 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
400 {fail "handle SIG with bogus action"}
401 timeout {fail "(timeout) handle SIG with bogus action"}
402 }
403
404# Verify that "handle" can take multiple actions per SIG, and that in
405# the case of conflicting actions, that the rightmost action "wins".
406#
407 send_gdb "handle SIGHUP print noprint\n"
408 gdb_expect {
409 -re ".*SIGHUP\[ \t\]*No\[ \t\]*No\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Hangup.*$gdb_prompt $"\
410 {pass "handle SIG with multiple conflicting actions"}
411 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
412 {fail "handle SIG with multiple conflicting actions"}
413 timeout {fail "(timeout) handle SIG with multiple conflicting actions"}
414 }
415
416# Exercise all the various actions. (We don't care what the outcome
417# is, this is just to ensure that they all can be parsed.)
418#
419 send_gdb "handle SIGHUP print noprint stop nostop ignore noignore pass nopass\n"
420 gdb_expect {
421 -re ".*Signal.*$gdb_prompt $"\
422 {pass "handle SIG parses all legal actions"}
423 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
424 {fail "handle SIG parses all legal actions"}
425 timeout {fail "(timeout) handle SIG parses all legal actions"}
426 }
427
428# Verify that we can "handle" multiple signals at once, interspersed
429# with actions.
430#
431 send_gdb "handle SIG63 print SIGILL\n"
432 gdb_expect {
433 -re ".*SIGILL\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Illegal instruction.*SIG63\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Real-time event 63.*$gdb_prompt $"\
434 {pass "handle multiple SIGs"}
435 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
436 {fail "handle multiple SIGs"}
437 timeout {fail "(timeout) handle multiple SIGs"}
438 }
439
440# Verify that "handle" can take a numeric argument for the signal ID,
441# rather than a symbolic name. (This may not be portable; works for
442# HP-UX.)
443#
444# Also note that this testpoint overrides SIGTRAP, which on HP-UX at
445# least, is used to implement single-steps and breakpoints. Don't
446# expect to run the inferior after this!
447#
448 send_gdb "handle 5 nopass\n"
449 gdb_expect {
450 -re ".*SIGTRAP is used by the debugger.*Are you sure you want to change it.*y or n.*"\
451 {send_gdb "y\n"
452 gdb_expect {
453 -re ".*SIGTRAP\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*Yes\[ \t\]*No\[ \t\]*Trace/breakpoint trap.*$gdb_prompt $"\
454 {pass "override SIGTRAP (#5)"}
455 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
456 {fail "override SIGTRAP (#5)"}
457 timeout {fail "(timeout) override SIGTRAP (#5)"}
458 }
459 }
460 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
461 {fail "override SIGTRAP (#5)"}
462 timeout {fail "(timeout) override SIGTRAP (#5)"}
463 }
464
465# GDB doesn't seem to allow numeric signal IDs larger than 15. Verify
466# that restriction. ??rehrauer: Not sure if this is a feature or a
467# bug, actually. Why is the range 1-15?
468#
469 send_gdb "handle 58\n"
470 gdb_expect {
471 -re "Only signals 1-15 are valid as numeric signals.*Use \"info signals\" for a list of symbolic signals.*$gdb_prompt $"\
472 {pass "invalid signal number rejected"}
473 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
474 {fail "invalid signal number rejected"}
475 timeout {fail "(timeout) invalid signal number rejected"}
476 }
477
478# Verify that we can accept a signal ID range (number-number).
479# ??rehrauer: This feature isn't documented on the quick-reference
480# card.
481#
482 send_gdb "handle 13-15\n"
483 gdb_expect {
484 -re ".*SIGPIPE.*SIGALRM.*SIGTERM.*$gdb_prompt $"\
485 {pass "handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}
486 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
487 {fail "handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}
488 timeout {fail "(timeout) handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}
489
490 }
491
492# Bizarrely enough, GDB also allows you to reverse the range
493# stat, stop IDs. E.g., "3-1" and "1-3" mean the same thing.
494# Probably this isn't documented, but the code anticipates it,
495# so we'd best test it...
496#
497 send_gdb "handle 15-13\n"
498 gdb_expect {
499 -re ".*SIGPIPE.*SIGALRM.*SIGTERM.*$gdb_prompt $"\
500 {pass "handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}
501 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
502 {fail "handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}
503 timeout {fail "(timeout) handle multiple SIGs via integer range"}
504
505 }
506
507# SIGINT is used by the debugger as well. Verify that we can change
508# our minds about changing it.
509#
510 send_gdb "handle SIGINT nopass\n"
511 gdb_expect {
512 -re ".*SIGINT is used by the debugger.*Are you sure you want to change it.*y or n.*"\
513 {send_gdb "n\n"
514# ??rehrauer: When you answer "n", the header for the signal info is
515# printed, but not the actual handler settings. Probably a bug.
516#
517 gdb_expect {
518 -re "Not confirmed, unchanged.*Signal.*$gdb_prompt $"\
519 {pass "override SIGINT"}
520 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
521 {fail "override SIGINT"}
522 timeout {fail "(timeout) override SIGINT"}
523 }
524 }
525 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
526 {fail "override SIGINT"}
527 timeout {fail "(timeout) override SIGINT"}
528 }
529
530# Verify that GDB responds gracefully to the "signal" command with
531# a missing argument.
532#
533 send_gdb "signal\n"
534 gdb_expect {
535 -re "Argument required .signal number..*$gdb_prompt $"\
536 {pass "signal without arguments disallowed"}
537 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
538 {fail "signal without arguments disallowed"}
539 timeout {fail "(timeout) signal without arguments disallowed"}
540 }
541
542# Verify that we can successfully send a signal other than 0 to
543# the inferior. (This probably causes the inferior to run away.
544# Be prepared to rerun to main for further testing.)
545#
546 send_gdb "signal 5\n"
547 gdb_expect {
548 -re "Continuing with signal SIGTRAP.*$gdb_prompt $"\
549 {pass "sent signal 5"}
550 -re "$gdb_prompt $"\
551 {fail "sent signal 5"}
552 timeout {fail "(timeout) sent signal 5"}
553 }
554
555}
556
557return 0