]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git/blame - gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp
Updated copyright notices for most files.
[thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / testsuite / gdb.base / structs.exp
CommitLineData
e53890ae
AC
1# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
2
9b254dd1
DJ
3# Copyright 1996, 1997, 1999, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2008
4# Free Software Foundation, Inc.
74cf1395
JM
5
6# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
7# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
e22f8b7c 8# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
74cf1395 9# (at your option) any later version.
e22f8b7c 10#
74cf1395
JM
11# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
12# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
13# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
14# GNU General Public License for more details.
e22f8b7c 15#
74cf1395 16# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
e22f8b7c 17# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
74cf1395
JM
18
19# Please email any bugs, comments, and/or additions to this file to:
20# bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu
21
74cf1395
JM
22if $tracelevel then {
23 strace $tracelevel
24}
25
26set prms_id 0
27set bug_id 0
28
e53890ae
AC
29# Some targets can't call functions, so don't even bother with this
30# test.
31
32if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] {
33 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
34 fail "This target can not call functions"
35 continue
36}
37
74cf1395
JM
38set testfile "structs"
39set srcfile ${testfile}.c
40set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
41
e53890ae
AC
42# Create and source the file that provides information about the
43# compiler used to compile the test case.
853d6e5b 44
b4967060
AC
45if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] {
46 return -1;
853d6e5b
AC
47}
48
e53890ae
AC
49# Compile a variant of structs.c using TYPES to specify the type of
50# the first N struct elements (the remaining elements take the type of
51# the last TYPES field). Run the compmiled program up to "main".
52# Also updates the global "testfile" to reflect the most recent build.
853d6e5b 53
e53890ae
AC
54proc start_structs_test { types } {
55 global testfile
56 global srcfile
57 global binfile
58 global objdir
59 global subdir
60 global srcdir
61 global gdb_prompt
62
63 # Create the additional flags
64 set flags "debug"
65 set testfile "structs"
66 set n 0
67 for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
68 set m [I2A ${n}]
69 set t [lindex ${types} $n]
70 lappend flags "additional_flags=-Dt${m}=${t}"
71 append testfile "-" "$t"
72 }
73
74 set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
75 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags}"] != "" } {
76 # built the second test case since we can't use prototypes
77 warning "Prototypes not supported, rebuilding with -DNO_PROTOTYPES"
78 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags} additional_flags=-DNO_PROTOTYPES"] != "" } {
b60f0898
JB
79 untested structs.exp
80 return -1
e53890ae
AC
81 }
82 }
83
84 # Start with a fresh gdb.
e42c7771 85 gdb_exit
e53890ae
AC
86 gdb_start
87 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
88 gdb_load ${binfile}
89
90 # Make certain that the output is consistent
91 gdb_test "set print sevenbit-strings" "" \
92 "set print sevenbit-strings; ${testfile}"
93 gdb_test "set print address off" "" \
94 "set print address off; ${testfile}"
95 gdb_test "set width 0" "" \
96 "set width 0; ${testfile}"
97
98 # Advance to main
99 if { ![runto_main] } then {
100 gdb_suppress_tests;
101 }
b729099e
MC
102
103 # Get the debug format
104 get_debug_format
e53890ae
AC
105
106 # check that at the struct containing all the relevant types is correct
107 set foo_t "type = struct struct[llength ${types}] \{"
108 for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
109 append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+[lindex ${types} $n] [i2a $n];"
110 }
111 append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+\}"
112 gdb_test "ptype foo[llength ${types}]" "${foo_t}" \
113 "ptype foo[llength ${types}]; ${testfile}"
74cf1395
JM
114}
115
e53890ae
AC
116# The expected value for fun${n}, L${n} and foo${n}. First element is
117# empty to make indexing easier. "foo" returns the modified value,
118# "zed" returns the invalid value.
853d6e5b 119
e53890ae
AC
120proc foo { n } {
121 return [lindex {
122 "{}"
123 "{a = 49 '1'}"
124 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2'}"
125 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3'}"
126 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4'}"
127 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5'}"
128 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6'}"
129 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7'}"
130 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8'}"
131 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9'}"
132 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A'}"
133 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B'}"
134 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C'}"
135 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D'}"
136 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E'}"
137 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F'}"
138 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E', o = 111 'o', p = 71 'G'}"
139 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F', p = 112 'p', q = 72 'H'}"
140 } $n]
141}
142
143proc zed { n } {
144 return [lindex {
145 "{}"
146 "{a = 90 'Z'}"
147 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z'}"
148 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z'}"
149 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z'}"
150 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z'}"
151 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z'}"
152 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z'}"
153 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z'}"
154 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z'}"
155 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z'}"
156 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z'}"
157 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z'}"
158 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z'}"
159 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z'}"
160 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z'}"
161 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z'}"
162 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z', q = 90 'Z'}"
163 } $n]
164}
165
987a9106
JB
166proc any { n } {
167 return [lindex {
168 "{}"
169 "{a = \[^,\}\]*}"
170 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*}"
171 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*}"
172 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*}"
173 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*}"
174 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*}"
175 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*}"
176 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*}"
177 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*}"
178 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*}"
179 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*}"
180 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*}"
181 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*}"
182 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*}"
183 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*, o = \[^,\}\]*}"
184 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*, o = \[^,\}\]*, p = \[^,\}\]*}"
185 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*, o = \[^,\}\]*, p = \[^,\}\]*, q = \[^,\}\]*}"
186 } $n]
187}
188
e53890ae
AC
189# Given N (0..25), return the corresponding alphabetic letter in lower
190# or upper case. This is ment to be i18n proof.
191
192proc i2a { n } {
193 return [string range "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" $n $n]
194}
195
196proc I2A { n } {
197 return [string toupper [i2a $n]]
198}
199
200
201# Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs.
202
203proc setup_kfails { file tuples bug } {
204 global testfile
205 if [string match $file $testfile] {
206 foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
853d6e5b 207 }
74cf1395
JM
208}
209
e53890ae
AC
210proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } {
211 global testfile
212 if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler] && [test_debug_format $format]} {
213 foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
214 }
215}
216
217# Test GDB's ability to make inferior function calls to functions
218# returning (or passing in a single structs.
219
220# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
221# for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
222# this test.
853d6e5b 223
e53890ae
AC
224# start_structs_test() will have previously built a program with a
225# specified combination of types for those elements. To ensure
226# robustness of the output, "p/c" is used.
227
228# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?" and
229# "extract return-value from registers" called by "infcall.c".
230
231proc test_struct_calls { n } {
232 global testfile
b4967060 233 global gdb_prompt
853d6e5b 234
e53890ae
AC
235 # Check that GDB can always extract a struct-return value from an
236 # inferior function call. Since GDB always knows the location of an
237 # inferior function call's return value these should never fail
238
239 # Implemented by calling the parameterless function "fun$N" and then
240 # examining the return value printed by GDB.
853d6e5b 241
e53890ae 242 set tests "call $n ${testfile}"
853d6e5b 243
e53890ae 244 # Call fun${n}, checking the printed return-value.
338e05af
AC
245 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
246 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
e53890ae 247 gdb_test "p/c fun${n}()" "[foo ${n}]" "p/c fun<n>(); ${tests}"
853d6e5b 248
e53890ae
AC
249 # Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function.
250 # This test can never fail.
251
252 # Implemented by calling the one parameter function "Fun$N" which
253 # stores its parameter in the global variable "L$N". GDB then
254 # examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected.
255
256 gdb_test "call Fun${n}(foo${n})" "" "call Fun<n>(foo<n>); ${tests}"
338e05af
AC
257 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
258 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
e53890ae 259 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" [foo ${n}] "p/c L<n>; ${tests}"
b4967060 260}
853d6e5b 261
e53890ae
AC
262# Test GDB's ability to both return a function (with "return" or
263# "finish") and correctly extract/store any corresponding
264# return-value.
265
266# Check that GDB can consistently extract/store structure return
267# values. There are two cases - returned in registers and returned in
268# memory. For the latter case, the return value can't be found and a
269# failure is "expected". However GDB must still both return the
270# function and display the final source and line information.
271
272# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
273# for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
274# this test.
275
276# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?", "extract
277# return-value from registers", and "store return-value in registers".
278# Unlike "test struct calls", this test is expected to "fail" when the
279# return-value is in memory (GDB can't find the location). The test
280# is in three parts: test "return"; test "finish"; check that the two
281# are consistent. GDB can sometimes work for one command and not the
282# other.
283
284proc test_struct_returns { n } {
285 global gdb_prompt
286 global testfile
287
288 set tests "return $n ${testfile}"
289
290
291 # Check that "return" works.
292
293 # GDB must always force the return of a function that has
294 # a struct result. Dependant on the ABI, it may, or may not be
295 # possible to store the return value in a register.
296
297 # The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()". The test forces
298 # "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value. Since that code
299 # snippet will store the the returned value in "L{n}" the return
300 # is tested by examining "L{n}". This assumes that the
301 # compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when
302 # the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged. Also check for
303 # consistency between this and the "finish" case.
304
305 # Get into a call of fun${n}
306 gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
307 "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
308 "advance to fun<n> for return; ${tests}"
309
310 # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
1bfbbb9d 311 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for return; ${tests}"
e53890ae
AC
312
313 # Force the "return". This checks that the return is always
314 # performed, and that GDB correctly reported this to the user.
315 # GDB 6.0 and earlier, when the return-value's location wasn't
316 # known, both failed to print a final "source and line" and misplaced
317 # the frame ("No frame").
318
319 # The test is writen so that it only reports one FAIL/PASS for the
320 # entire operation. The value returned is checked further down.
b5c0bfa2
AC
321 # "return_value_known", if non-zero, indicates that GDB knew where
322 # the return value was located.
e53890ae 323
e53890ae 324 set test "return foo<n>; ${tests}"
b5c0bfa2 325 set return_value_known 1
5266b69c 326 set return_value_unimplemented 0
d422fe19 327 gdb_test_multiple "return foo${n}" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
328 -re "The location" {
329 # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
b5c0bfa2 330 set return_value_known 0
e53890ae
AC
331 exp_continue
332 }
333 -re "A structure or union" {
334 # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
b5c0bfa2 335 set return_value_known 0
5266b69c
AC
336 # Double ulgh. Architecture doesn't use return_value and
337 # hence hasn't implemented small structure return.
338 set return_value_unimplemented 1
e53890ae
AC
339 exp_continue
340 }
341 -re "Make fun${n} return now.*y or n. $" {
d422fe19 342 gdb_test_multiple "y" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
343 -re "L${n} *= fun${n}.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
344 # Need to step off the function call
345 gdb_test "next" "L.* *= fun.*" "${test}"
346 }
347 -re "L[expr ${n} + 1] *= fun[expr ${n} + 1].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
348 pass "${test}"
349 }
e53890ae
AC
350 }
351 }
e53890ae
AC
352 }
353
354 # Check that the return-value is as expected. At this stage we're
355 # just checking that GDB has returned a value consistent with
b5c0bfa2 356 # "return_value_known" set above.
987a9106
JB
357 #
358 # Note that, when return_value_known is false, we can't make any
359 # assumptions at all about the value L<n>:
360 #
361 # - If the caller passed the address of L<n> directly as fun<n>'s
362 # return value buffer, then L<n> will be unchanged, because we
363 # forced fun<n> to return before it could store anything in it.
364 #
365 # - If the caller passed the address of some temporary buffer to
366 # fun<n>, and then copied the buffer into L<n>, then L<n> will
367 # have been overwritten with whatever garbage was in the
368 # uninitialized buffer.
369 #
370 # - However, if the temporary buffer just happened to have the
371 # "right" value of foo<n> in it, then L<n> will, in fact, have
372 # the value you'd expect to see if the 'return' had worked!
373 # This has actually been observed to happen on the Renesas M32C.
374 #
375 # So, really, anything is acceptable unless return_value_known is
376 # true.
e53890ae 377
e53890ae 378 set test "value foo<n> returned; ${tests}"
d422fe19 379 gdb_test_multiple "p/c L${n}" "${test}" {
e53890ae 380 -re " = [foo ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
987a9106
JB
381 # This answer is okay regardless of whether GDB claims to
382 # have set the return value: if it did, then this is what
383 # we expected; and if it didn't, then any answer is okay.
384 pass "${test}"
e53890ae 385 }
987a9106 386 -re " = [any $n].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
b5c0bfa2
AC
387 if $return_value_known {
388 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew
987a9106 389 # the location of the return value.
b5c0bfa2
AC
390 fail "${test}"
391 } else {
987a9106
JB
392 # We expected L${n} to be set to garbage, so any
393 # answer is acceptable.
e53890ae 394 pass "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
395 }
396 }
5266b69c
AC
397 -re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" {
398 if $return_value_unimplemented {
399 # What a suprize. The architecture hasn't implemented
400 # return_value, and hence has to fail.
401 kfail "$test" gdb/1444
402 } else {
403 fail "$test"
404 }
405 }
e53890ae
AC
406 }
407
408 # Check that a "finish" works.
409
410 # This is almost but not quite the same as "call struct funcs".
411 # Architectures can have subtle differences in the two code paths.
412
413 # The relevant code snippet is "L{n} = fun{n}()". The program is
414 # advanced into a call to "fun{n}" and then that function is
415 # finished. The returned value that GDB prints, reformatted using
416 # "p/c", is checked.
417
418 # Get into "fun${n}()".
419 gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
420 "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
421 "advance to fun<n> for finish; ${tests}"
422
423 # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
e53890ae
AC
424 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for finish; ${tests}"
425
b5c0bfa2
AC
426 # Finish the function, set 'finish_value_known" to non-empty if
427 # the return-value was found.
428
6882279b 429 set test "finish foo<n>; ${tests}"
b5c0bfa2 430 set finish_value_known 1
d422fe19 431 gdb_test_multiple "finish" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
432 -re "Value returned is .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
433 pass "${test}"
434 }
435 -re "Cannot determine contents.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
436 # Expected bad value. For the moment this is ok.
b5c0bfa2 437 set finish_value_known 0
e53890ae
AC
438 pass "${test}"
439 }
e53890ae
AC
440 }
441
442 # Re-print the last (return-value) using the more robust
443 # "p/c". If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous
444 # check that the variable was cleared, is printed.
6882279b 445 set test "value foo<n> finished; ${tests}"
d422fe19 446 gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" {
e53890ae 447 -re "[foo ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
b5c0bfa2
AC
448 if $finish_value_known {
449 pass "${test}"
450 } else {
e53890ae
AC
451 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
452 # know the location of the return-value.
453 fail "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
454 }
455 }
456 -re "[zed ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
457 # The value didn't get found. This is "expected".
b5c0bfa2 458 if $finish_value_known {
e53890ae
AC
459 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB did
460 # know the location of the return-value.
461 fail "${test}"
b5c0bfa2
AC
462 } else {
463 pass "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
464 }
465 }
e53890ae
AC
466 }
467
468 # Finally, check that "return" and finish" have consistent
469 # behavior.
470
b5c0bfa2
AC
471 # Since "finish" works in more cases than "return" (see
472 # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_RETURNS_ADDRESS and
473 # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_PRESERVES_ADDRESS), the "return" value being
474 # known implies that the "finish" value is known (but not the
475 # reverse).
e53890ae 476
b5c0bfa2
AC
477 set test "return value known implies finish value known; ${tests}"
478 if {$return_value_known && ! $finish_value_known} {
e53890ae 479 kfail gdb/1444 "${test}"
b5c0bfa2
AC
480 } else {
481 pass "${test}"
e53890ae 482 }
b4967060 483}
853d6e5b 484
e53890ae
AC
485# ABIs pass anything >8 or >16 bytes in memory but below that things
486# randomly use register and/and structure conventions. Check all
487# possible sized char structs in that range. But only a restricted
488# range of the other types.
489
490# NetBSD/PPC returns "unnatural" (3, 5, 6, 7) sized structs in memory.
491
492# d10v is weird. 5/6 byte structs go in memory. 2 or more char
493# structs go in memory. Everything else is in a register!
494
495# Test every single char struct from 1..17 in size. This is what the
496# original "structs" test was doing.
497
498start_structs_test { tc }
499test_struct_calls 1
500test_struct_calls 2
501test_struct_calls 3
502test_struct_calls 4
503test_struct_calls 5
504test_struct_calls 6
505test_struct_calls 7
506test_struct_calls 8
507test_struct_calls 9
508test_struct_calls 10
509test_struct_calls 11
510test_struct_calls 12
511test_struct_calls 13
512test_struct_calls 14
513test_struct_calls 15
514test_struct_calls 16
515test_struct_calls 17
516test_struct_returns 1
517test_struct_returns 2
518test_struct_returns 3
519test_struct_returns 4
520test_struct_returns 5
521test_struct_returns 6
522test_struct_returns 7
523test_struct_returns 8
524
525
526# Let the fun begin.
527
528# Assuming that any integer struct larger than 8 bytes goes in memory,
529# come up with many and varied combinations of a return struct. For
530# "struct calls" test just beyond that 8 byte boundary, for "struct
531# returns" test up to that boundary.
532
533# For floats, assumed that up to two struct elements can be stored in
534# floating point registers, regardless of their size.
535
536# The approx size of each structure it is computed assumed that tc=1,
537# ts=2, ti=4, tl=4, tll=8, tf=4, td=8, tld=16, and that all fields are
538# naturally aligned. Padding being added where needed. Note that
539# these numbers are just approx, the d10v has ti=2, a 64-bit has has
540# tl=8.
541
542# Approx size: 2, 4, ...
543start_structs_test { ts }
544test_struct_calls 1
545test_struct_calls 2
546test_struct_calls 3
547test_struct_calls 4
548test_struct_calls 5
549test_struct_returns 1
550test_struct_returns 2
551test_struct_returns 3
552test_struct_returns 4
553
554# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
555start_structs_test { ti }
556test_struct_calls 1
557test_struct_calls 2
558test_struct_calls 3
559test_struct_returns 1
560test_struct_returns 2
561
562# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
563start_structs_test { tl }
564test_struct_calls 1
565test_struct_calls 2
566test_struct_calls 3
567test_struct_returns 1
568test_struct_returns 2
569
570# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
571start_structs_test { tll }
572test_struct_calls 1
573test_struct_calls 2
574test_struct_returns 1
575
576# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
577start_structs_test { tf }
578test_struct_calls 1
579test_struct_calls 2
580test_struct_calls 3
581test_struct_returns 1
582test_struct_returns 2
583
584# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
585start_structs_test { td }
586test_struct_calls 1
587test_struct_calls 2
588test_struct_returns 1
589
590# Approx size: 16, 32, ...
591start_structs_test { tld }
592test_struct_calls 1
593test_struct_calls 2
594test_struct_returns 1
595
596# Approx size: 2+1=3, 4, ...
597start_structs_test { ts tc }
598test_struct_calls 2
599test_struct_calls 3
600test_struct_calls 4
601test_struct_calls 5
602test_struct_calls 6
603test_struct_calls 7
604test_struct_calls 8
605test_struct_returns 2
606
607# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
608start_structs_test { ti tc }
609test_struct_calls 2
610test_struct_calls 3
611test_struct_calls 4
612test_struct_calls 5
613test_struct_calls 6
614test_struct_returns 2
615
616# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
617start_structs_test { tl tc }
618test_struct_calls 2
619test_struct_calls 3
620test_struct_calls 4
621test_struct_calls 5
622test_struct_calls 6
623test_struct_returns 2
624
625# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
626start_structs_test { tll tc }
627test_struct_calls 2
628
629# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
630start_structs_test { tf tc }
631test_struct_calls 2
632test_struct_calls 3
633test_struct_calls 4
634test_struct_calls 5
635test_struct_calls 6
636test_struct_returns 2
637
638# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
639start_structs_test { td tc }
640test_struct_calls 2
641
642# Approx size: 16+1=17, 18, ...
643start_structs_test { tld tc }
644test_struct_calls 2
645
646# Approx size: (1+1)+2=4, 6, ...
647start_structs_test { tc ts }
648test_struct_calls 2
649test_struct_calls 3
650test_struct_calls 4
651test_struct_calls 5
652test_struct_calls 6
653test_struct_returns 2
654
655# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
656start_structs_test { tc ti }
657test_struct_calls 2
658test_struct_calls 3
659test_struct_calls 4
660test_struct_returns 2
661
662# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
663start_structs_test { tc tl }
664test_struct_calls 2
665test_struct_calls 3
666test_struct_calls 4
667test_struct_returns 2
668
669# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
670start_structs_test { tc tll }
671test_struct_calls 2
672
673# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
674start_structs_test { tc tf }
675test_struct_calls 2
676test_struct_calls 3
677test_struct_calls 4
678
679# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
680start_structs_test { tc td }
681test_struct_calls 2
682
683# Approx size: (1+15)+16=32, 48, ...
684start_structs_test { tc tld }
685test_struct_calls 2
686
687# Some float combinations
688
689# Approx size: 8+4=12, 16, ...
690# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
691start_structs_test { td tf }
692test_struct_calls 2
693test_struct_returns 2
74cf1395 694
e53890ae
AC
695# Approx size: (4+4)+8=16, 32, ...
696# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
697start_structs_test { tf td }
698test_struct_calls 2
699test_struct_returns 2
74cf1395
JM
700
701return 0