projects / thirdparty / binutils-gdb.git / blame
| Commit | Line | Data |
|---|---|---|
| f9267e15 EZ |
1 | From rms@gnu.org Thu Jul 22 20:37:55 1999 |
| 2 | Flags: 10 | |
| 3 | Return-Path: rms@gnu.org | |
| 4 | Received: from arthur.INS.CWRU.Edu (root@arthur.INS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.8.215]) by odin.INS.CWRU.Edu with ESMTP (8.8.6+cwru/CWRU-2.4-ins) | |
| 5 | id UAA25349; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:54 -0400 (EDT) (from rms@gnu.org for <chet@odin.INS.CWRU.Edu>) | |
| 6 | Received: from nike.ins.cwru.edu (root@nike.INS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.8.219]) by arthur.INS.CWRU.Edu with ESMTP (8.8.8+cwru/CWRU-3.6) | |
| 7 | id UAA05311; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:51 -0400 (EDT) (from rms@gnu.org for <chet@po.cwru.edu>) | |
| 8 | Received: from pele.santafe.edu (pele.santafe.edu [192.12.12.119]) by nike.ins.cwru.edu with ESMTP (8.8.7/CWRU-2.5-bsdi) | |
| 9 | id UAA13350; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:50 -0400 (EDT) (from rms@gnu.org for <chet@nike.ins.cwru.edu>) | |
| 10 | Received: from wijiji.santafe.edu (wijiji [192.12.12.5]) | |
| 11 | by pele.santafe.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA10831 | |
| 12 | for <chet@nike.ins.cwru.edu>; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:47 -0600 (MDT) | |
| 13 | Received: (from rms@localhost) | |
| 14 | by wijiji.santafe.edu (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id SAA01089; | |
| 15 | Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:46 -0600 (MDT) | |
| 16 | Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:46 -0600 (MDT) | |
| 17 | Message-Id: <199907230037.SAA01089@wijiji.santafe.edu> | |
| 18 | X-Authentication-Warning: wijiji.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@gnu.org using -f | |
| 19 | From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> | |
| 20 | To: chet@nike.ins.cwru.edu | |
| 21 | Subject: Use of Readline | |
| 22 | Reply-to: rms@gnu.org | |
| 23 | ||
| 24 | I think Allbery's suggestion is a good one. So please add this text | |
| 25 | in a suitable place. Please don't put it in the GPL itself; that | |
| 26 | should be the same as the GPL everywhere else. Putting it in the | |
| 27 | README and/or the documentation would be a good idea. | |
| 28 | ||
| 29 | ||
| 30 | ====================================================================== | |
| 31 | Our position on the use of Readline through a shared-library linking | |
| 32 | mechanism is that there is no legal difference between shared-library | |
| 33 | linking and static linking--either kind of linking combines various | |
| 34 | modules into a single larger work. The conditions for using Readline | |
| 35 | in a larger work are stated in section 3 of the GNU GPL. | |
| 36 | ||
| 37 |