As reported by Alan Stern:
Here are two extracts from the man page for ppoll(2):
Specifying a negative value in timeout means an infinite
timeout.
Other than the difference in the precision of the timeout
argument, the following ppoll() call:
ready = ppoll(&fds, nfds, tmo_p, &sigmask);
is equivalent to atomically executing the following calls:
sigset_t origmask;
int timeout;
timeout = (tmo_p == NULL) ? -1 :
(tmo_p->tv_sec * 1000 + tmo_p->tv_nsec /
1000000);
pthread_sigmask(SIG_SETMASK, &sigmask, &origmask);
ready = poll(&fds, nfds, timeout);
pthread_sigmask(SIG_SETMASK, &origmask, NULL);
But if tmo_p->tv_sec is negative, the ppoll() call is not
equivalent to the corresponding poll() call. The kernel rejects
negative values of tv_sec with an EINVAL error; it does not
interpret the value as meaning an infinite timeout.
(Yes, the kernel interprets tmo_p == NULL as an infinite timeout,
but the man page is still wrong for the case tmo_p->tv_sec < 0.)
Suggested fix: Following the end of the second extract above, add:
except that negative time values in tmo_p are not
interpreted as an infinite timeout.
Also, in the ERRORS section, change the text for EINVAL to:
EINVAL The nfds value exceeds the RLIMIT_NOFILE value or
*tmo_p contains an invalid (negative) time value.
Reported-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>