lsmem currently calculates the total online/offline memory by iterating
over all lsmem->blocks. Depending on the lsmem options, there may be
only one lsmem->block, because all sysfs memory blocks could be merged
into one. In this case, the calculation is wrong, because the individual
online/offline state of the sysfs memory blocks is not preserved, but
rather lsmem->blocks[0].state is set to the state of the first sysfs
memory block, typically MEMORY_STATE_ONLINE (at least on s390).
This means that "Total offline memory" will always be calculated as 0
in such cases, e.g. when using "lsmem --summary", or any options that
would merge the table output to one line, like "lsmem -o RANGE":
~# lsmem --summary
Memory block size: 1G
Total online memory: 20G
Total offline memory: 0B
Adding the "-a" option shows the real summary, since there is no block
merging going on, and the calculation is therefore correct:
~# lsmem -a --summary
Memory block size: 1G
Total online memory: 16G
Total offline memory: 4G
Fix this by moving the online/offline calculation into the loop that
is iterating over all sysfs memory blocks, instead of iterating over
potentially merged lsmem->blocks.
Reported-by: Alexander Klein <alkl@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
for (i = 0; i < lsmem->ndirs; i++) {
memory_block_read_attrs(lsmem, lsmem->dirs[i]->d_name, &blk);
+ if (blk.state == MEMORY_STATE_ONLINE)
+ lsmem->mem_online += lsmem->block_size;
+ else
+ lsmem->mem_offline += lsmem->block_size;
if (is_mergeable(lsmem, &blk)) {
lsmem->blocks[lsmem->nblocks - 1].count++;
continue;
lsmem->blocks = xrealloc(lsmem->blocks, lsmem->nblocks * sizeof(blk));
*&lsmem->blocks[lsmem->nblocks - 1] = blk;
}
- for (i = 0; i < lsmem->nblocks; i++) {
- if (lsmem->blocks[i].state == MEMORY_STATE_ONLINE)
- lsmem->mem_online += lsmem->block_size * lsmem->blocks[i].count;
- else
- lsmem->mem_offline += lsmem->block_size * lsmem->blocks[i].count;
- }
}
static int memory_block_filter(const struct dirent *de)